Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model output discussion - into the last third of January


Paul

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Scunthorpe
  • Location: Scunthorpe

Still some good charts showing up amongst GFS 06z and its ensembles and some are in the near future too

Dream Cold Fantasy GFS 06z Charts

The first two charts are very much in the close timeframe

Member 16 +60 hours

image.thumb.png.5f84b59b3ddaa63b0099edb672458fa4.pngimage.thumb.png.69ab36572c27ac7b60f54e0399adbd14.png

Member 29 +60 hours

image.thumb.png.9c63692b702f86c7fd927aaec658afd9.pngimage.thumb.png.d4e06258cda9fb7d520942a74bdca03c.png

A couple of cold outliers during our current colder spell see -10C uppers in the mix so more definite snow risk here with low pressure also dominating the scene too

Now for a selection from further away

Member 29 + 252 hours

image.thumb.png.5736a184c3fab1a1437228c05ab677b0.pngimage.thumb.png.8b88d297fcb8ebd9781ddd0d0bb4b022.png

After the initial cold Member 29 has a brief mild blip just before this colder spell sets up and peaks at +252 hours away. After this Member 29 then generally lifts back up to around average again

Member 3 +276 hours

image.thumb.png.bf3f460eeab6ffb44977a8f4ebb1b9b9.pngimage.thumb.png.96b8135c975416808457907c1cf8560b.png

This is where Member 3 gets cold and in general stays close to -10 uppers right to the very end so the start of a longer cold spell here

Member 14 +342 hours

image.thumb.png.21b61f501afd946d5eb79617a439f17d.pngimage.thumb.png.6822419b47196695feccc6018b2fe0bb.png

A few chilly periods within Member 14 but this is the part where some real cold makes a brief appearance

Member 17 +354 hours

image.thumb.png.fdff67dbfa42566339aecc9c6c858061.pngimage.thumb.png.8881a405440a80cbf4c3308a256a7c01.png

A generally average run within the collection but this is the start of what looks like is going to be a longer cold spell

Nightmarishly Mild GFS 06z Charts

Member 26 +198 hours

image.thumb.png.2519d45bfb7bb99d9011c7d2acbb3b83.pngimage.thumb.png.3c9bf338c6801d06b8e9019b54f2eba8.png

Member 28 +294 hours

image.thumb.png.f0f6d8b173958a16cc5604b462ce36e0.pngimage.thumb.png.51a2fa125cc2751781619bfc904fe6aa.png

GEM

Here is the GEM's 00z fantasy chart pick

GEM 00z Member 8 +276 hours

image.thumb.png.864150525ba2b8e1bcb50c8d28f94f23.pngimage.thumb.png.bea3c1d9ab16cce5575dfaf5ed5f29d3.png

Look at that nice beasterly making its way into the UK with uppers below -10 at 850hpa

Follow this with the chart from hell

GEM 00z Member 11 +330 hours

image.thumb.png.56f756c68bd9f1e77602bfa7975b7eb3.pngimage.thumb.png.13ee41061da90c48670852572f95e616.png

Who wants to see +10 uppers over the UK in winter. I certainly don't. A total waste of winter when this happens. Save the +10 uppers for when we really want them in summer

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Scunthorpe
  • Location: Scunthorpe
1 hour ago, Battleground Snow said:

Very late in the run, but maybe a weak MJO response on the OP.

It's a shame the para run has got stuck at 102.

 

gfsnh-0-342 (5).png

This is the reason for the problems with the parallel run as shown on meteociel

30-day parallel test is temporarily stopped. Runs will be usually still available but with some missing.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Essex Riviera aka Burnham
  • Weather Preferences: 30 Degrees of pure British Celsius
  • Location: Essex Riviera aka Burnham
55 minutes ago, General Cluster said:

The SSW happened, and it has not 'failed'; it is what it is . . . but Hypers Anonymous clearly have failed -- but then they usually do!

Yes!...and the 'hypers anonymous' are not frequenting the mod thread nowhere as near as a few weeks back, I think we know who they are.

As regards to the SSW to early to call it a failure in terms of trop response to blocking...but it is the UK and it does feel like a real strain to get decent cold to these shores over recent years (2018 aside but I think that episode has skewed our expectations somewhat).

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.

So, here are the GEFS 06Z temp ensembles: a near-future marginal set-up (in that snowfall will depend on local conditions: T850s, dew points, proximity to windward coasts, altitude, windspeed -- as well as surface temps) followed by a mild spell... After that, it's anyone's guess?

t850Cheshire.png    t2mCheshire.png

Edited by General Cluster
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: South Oxfordshire
  • Location: South Oxfordshire
6 minutes ago, Tim Bland said:

Is it second week of Feb now? Wasn’t it first week of feb last week I think we should start being realistic and just discuss next winter

Messenger shooting belongs in the moan thread, but you'll be forgiven for posting GFS parallel fi charts later

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: chellaston, derby
  • Weather Preferences: The Actual Weather ..... not fantasy.
  • Location: chellaston, derby

Am i the only one who doesnt rate the MJO influence? Is there any corrobrative evidence that the MJO is much of a player? What state was the MJO in when we have had previous Big Freezes?

Seems to me people are grasping at straws for some kind of confirmation of a favoured weather type is likely.

Currently, imho, there is no sign of any developing Easterly, not in the ops nor my favoured NOAA anomaly charts ................................. but then again there wasnt in January 24th 1985 whos synoptic pattern was very close to whats expected by Tuesday next week. And we all know how February 1985 turned out!

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
4 minutes ago, Griff said:

Messenger shooting belongs in the moan thread, but you'll be forgiven for posting GFS parallel fi charts later

But it's nae 'shooting the messenger', it's pointing-out the patently obvious!?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coventry
  • Location: Coventry
2 minutes ago, mushymanrob said:

Am i the only one who doesnt rate the MJO influence? Is there any corrobrative evidence that the MJO is much of a player? What state was the MJO in when we have had previous Big Freezes?

Seems to me people are grasping at straws for some kind of confirmation of a favoured weather type is likely.

Currently, imho, there is no sign of any developing Easterly, not in the ops nor my favoured NOAA anomaly charts ................................. but then again there wasnt in January 24th 1985 whos synoptic pattern was very close to whats expected by Tuesday next week. And we all know how February 1985 turned out!

The 2018 event sticks in my mind.

Can somebody link the historical plots, I can't find them?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: clear skies , hard frost , snow !
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
18 minutes ago, mushymanrob said:

Am i the only one who doesnt rate the MJO influence? Is there any corrobrative evidence that the MJO is much of a player? What state was the MJO in when we have had previous Big Freezes?

Seems to me people are grasping at straws for some kind of confirmation of a favoured weather type is likely.

Currently, imho, there is no sign of any developing Easterly, not in the ops nor my favoured NOAA anomaly charts ................................. but then again there wasnt in January 24th 1985 whos synoptic pattern was very close to whats expected by Tuesday next week. And we all know how February 1985 turned out!

Feb 85 ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coventry
  • Location: Coventry

This is from the WMO.

so in answer to your question or rather statement @mushymanrob, there does appear to be *some* evidence

 

The cold event March 2013 coincided with the propagation of a Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) event into the western tropical Pacific. Studies (e.g. Cassou 2008, Lin et al, 2008) have shown that an active phase of the MJO over the western Pacific is conducive to negative NAO. Was this MJO event responsible for the cold event over Europe? To establish if there was a link between this MJO event and the cold March 2013, a composite of 2-metre temperature anomalies of the 10 ensemble member forecasts which predicted the strongest MJO event were compared to a composite of 2-metre temperature anomalies of the 10 ensemble member forecasts which predicted the weakest MJO for each individual forecast system (as for 2-metre temperature, MJO forecasts varied greatly between ensemble members). Results from the ECMWF model (Figure 3) and the NCEP model (figure 4) suggest that there was a strong link between the MJO event and the cold anomaly over Europe, with the ensemble members with a strong MJO predicting 2-metre temperature anomaly patterns more consistent with observations than the ensemble members with a weak MJO. The ensemble forecasts from Environment Canada showed the same link between good MJO forecasts and good 2-metre temperature forecasts 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Banbury
  • Weather Preferences: Deep Deep Snow causing chaos
  • Location: Banbury
4 minutes ago, Badgers01 said:

Feb 85 ?

www.trevorharley.com/1985.

Edited by MJB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: clear skies , hard frost , snow !
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
1 minute ago, MJB said:

www.trevorharley.com/1985.

feb 85 was a fairly unremarkable month not sure what the relevance for now is ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: clear skies , hard frost , snow !
  • Location: Cobham Surrey
5 minutes ago, Badgers01 said:

feb 85 was a fairly unremarkable month not sure what the relevance for now is ??

with a brief easterly mid month I guess that would do !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Banbury
  • Weather Preferences: Deep Deep Snow causing chaos
  • Location: Banbury
11 minutes ago, Badgers01 said:

feb 85 was a fairly unremarkable month not sure what the relevance for now is ??

Sorry firmly disagree , if it was unremarkable , I would lower your expectations 

February. Overall, anticyclonic, dry, and cool (2.1C CET). The first week was mild. There was a very cold spell starting on the 7th, with heavy snow in the south on the 8th and 9th. Then strong easterly winds brought beneath-freezing temperatures. In some parts of the south from the 9-13th the highest temperature was -4C. In some parts of the country the temperature only climbed above freezing on the 19th. It was sunny at the end of the month.

Edited by MJB
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill
7 minutes ago, Battleground Snow said:

This is from the WMO.

so in answer to your question or rather statement @mushymanrob, there does appear to be *some* evidence

 

The cold event March 2013 coincided with the propagation of a Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) event into the western tropical Pacific. Studies (e.g. Cassou 2008, Lin et al, 2008) have shown that an active phase of the MJO over the western Pacific is conducive to negative NAO. Was this MJO event responsible for the cold event over Europe? To establish if there was a link between this MJO event and the cold March 2013, a composite of 2-metre temperature anomalies of the 10 ensemble member forecasts which predicted the strongest MJO event were compared to a composite of 2-metre temperature anomalies of the 10 ensemble member forecasts which predicted the weakest MJO for each individual forecast system (as for 2-metre temperature, MJO forecasts varied greatly between ensemble members). Results from the ECMWF model (Figure 3) and the NCEP model (figure 4) suggest that there was a strong link between the MJO event and the cold anomaly over Europe, with the ensemble members with a strong MJO predicting 2-metre temperature anomaly patterns more consistent with observations than the ensemble members with a weak MJO. The ensemble forecasts from Environment Canada showed the same link between good MJO forecasts and good 2-metre temperature forecasts 

 

Was that not an ENSO neutral year? The whole issue with the forecast MJO, is whether it is a phantom anomaly, more like the La Nina spiking again as it will do and has done this winter? It is at its peak ATM but likely to power down slowly in the next few weeks and be neutral by Spring?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coventry
  • Location: Coventry
10 minutes ago, IDO said:

Was that not an ENSO neutral year? The whole issue with the forecast MJO, is whether it is a phantom anomaly, more like the La Nina spiking again as it will do and has done this winter? It is at its peak ATM but likely to power down slowly in the next few weeks and be neutral by Spring?

It was very weak la Nina around -0.4, when the MJO passed through West Pacific.

Interestingly the 2018 event was an moderate Nina that weakened, it also featured a SSWE

@IDO , maybe we are both correct on this. The moderate la Nina has interfered with the MJO so far, but now it's weakening, the MJO may be able to progress easier

 

Edited by Battleground Snow
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...