Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model output discussion pm 13/01/2016


phil nw.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)
  • Weather Preferences: Summer Sunshine / Winter Snow
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)
5 minutes ago, mulzy said:

What are you on about?  Once the low over in the Med clears to the east, the high will sink.  There is no further undercut to keep the high where it is.  It's a reasonable chart but it's a significant downgrade from previous runs.

As for the other models, the less said the better.

In summary - poor runs overnight - let#s wait for the EPS to see if there is a small glimmer...

I am not expert enough to say what will happen next week given the model output as it stands.

What I would say however is that cold pool to the East will prevent any Atlantic attack from getting any further than the UK so whether that means snowmageddon or a damp squib I am not sure but either way the cold will never be far away from our shores.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Santry, Dublin, Ireland. 50 metres ASL.
  • Location: Santry, Dublin, Ireland. 50 metres ASL.

Sadly, with that large chunk of vortex to the NE, there will be no omega block there. That's a significantly poorer chart on UKMO. Disappointing runs this morning.

 

That said, 5 or so days of cold wintery weather to enjoy now, we deserve this respite from warm, wind and rain!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • Weather Preferences: Snow!
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
3 minutes ago, Ali1977 said:

Those thinking there hasn't been a downgrade are mistaken, whilst the UKMO is still very cold to Wed, it is plain to see it wont last. GFS and ECM roll over easier than yesterday's charts. We have a very cold weekend to look forward to with frosts that may linger all day. Still only mid Jan, coldest 6 weeks of the year to come going off stats - I don't think we've seen the best of Winter yet.

I think the issue is the reactions to the runs, things yesterday were trending in the right direction and this has been one run, so we will have to wait and see how the models evolve today. People who say they would rather see a snowy breakdown, this would probably be maybe a few hours of snow which turns to rain/slush, followed by SW's. Is that really what people want? Or would you want to keep the cold and wait for snowy opportunities to arise, which they always do? So that said, I think today we should we hoping to see evolution's more in step with yesterdays runs. 

Edited by i luv snow
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately this is a downgrade by ukmo no matter how you want to paint it.  I can see a slow sinking evolution here keeping the south mainly dry with the north and west turning milder and wetter in line with my forecast last week.  There is hope that the high will reassert itself to bring in easterly winds which would give a proper cold spell rather than an imitation one.

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Carryduff, County Down 420ft ASL
  • Location: Carryduff, County Down 420ft ASL

The Met charts look similar to the NOAA long wave pattern projections so I feel the ECM and GFS are a little quick in bringing in the Atlantic, however, the end is now in site for this cold snap.

We await the torpedo...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
2 minutes ago, i luv snow said:

But cut-throat reactions to single runs is much more helpful, than teaching people to look at the bigger picture, not discounting all previous runs and taking the most recent as gospel without even waiting for the ensembles? That is the issue here, not whether a run is a upgrade or downgrade.

The downgrades this morning start at T72 so no way back I am afraid. Pragmatism must prevail for the sake of new members trying to feel their way. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Brighton (currently)
  • Location: Brighton (currently)

Not only have the models downgraded the duration of the cold spell but also the upper air temperatures do not look to be as cold. For example, the trough that is projected to come down the country tomorrow is now infested with warm sectors. Snow likely to be restricted to high ground.

Edited by karyo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • Weather Preferences: Snow!
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
1 minute ago, blizzard81 said:

The downgrades this morning start at T72 so no way back I am afraid. Pragmatism must prevail for the sake of new members trying to feel their way. 

Agree to disagree mate. You don't discount the few previous runs based on one single run.The upgrades might start at T48 on the next run, but it doesn't mean the models have sorted it out yet. That's all I'm saying. Pleasure to have such optimistic and enlightening posts for new members to read...

Edited by i luv snow
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Broxbourne, Herts
  • Weather Preferences: Snow snow and snow
  • Location: Broxbourne, Herts

The UKMO run being discussed is a downgrade on a lengthy cold spell...no question about it.  And to describe it as such is discussing that model run.  Yes it doesn't mean that it is now accurate whereas it wasn't before, but it is as legitimate to discuss it as it was to say how great the previous runs might have been.

In fact perhaps the most misleading thing is to say perhaps is that consistency in runs is a  good thing.  At the end of the day it's only accuracy that counts.  And where there are a range of signals that lead to a model providing different runs every time it comes out, perhaps it should be acknowledged that at least that model is responding to those signals and trying to bring them together, rather than ignoring them but trying to play catch up later?

Edited by Timmytour
spelling
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)
  • Weather Preferences: Summer Sunshine / Winter Snow
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)
1 minute ago, blizzard81 said:

The downgrades this morning start at T72 so no way back I am afraid. Pragmatism must prevail for the sake of new members trying to feel their way. 

Lets forget all of the ensembles and disregard all of the output from just last night then.

It may well turn milder but the 6z GFS could put us back in the freezer.  Just some balance would be nice!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: .
  • Location: .
53 minutes ago, joggs said:

Well I for one would rather have a GFS snowy breakdown than just the high slowly sinking and winds turning more Atlantic based.

An Omega Block wouldn't see any slow sinking high. 

As mentioned, it's the holy grail for cold lovers and it just shows the faintest hint at T144. It's no more than a quick flash of leg, but it's there.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wirral, Merseyside
  • Weather Preferences: Snow & Thunderstorms
  • Location: Wirral, Merseyside

Morning,

Let's hope for everyone's sake there's at least a snowy breakdown early next week then maybe a blip to more average conditions before the cold returns with a vengeance.

Nice blocking to the east here maybe to something to look for in the near future?

gfsnh-0-336.thumb.png.a48fc29e05ae19d007

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
  • Weather Preferences: Snow!
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
1 minute ago, Timmytour said:

The UKMO run being discussed is a downgrade on a lengthy cold spell...no question about it.  And to describe it as such is discussing that model run.  Yes it doesn't mean that it is now accurate whereas it wasn't before, but it is as legitimate to discuss it as it was to say how great the previous runs might have been.

In fact perhaps the most misleading thing is to say perhaps is that consistency in runs is a  good thing.  At the end of the day it's only accuracy that counts.  And where there are a range of signals that lead to a model providing different runs every time it comes out, perhaps it should be acknowledged that at least that model is responding to those signals and trying to bring them together, rather than ignoring them but trying to play catch up later?

Sorry to keep banging on about it, but you can comment on a particular run (perhaps with charts to back up your thoughts) but you can't talk about it as gospel, as if it is more likely to happen than the previous one, or the next one. And yes accuracy is of course important, but this is usually (note usually) accompanied by consistency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
1 minute ago, i luv snow said:

Agree to disagree mate. You don't discount the few previous runs based on one single run. Foolish. That's all I'm saying. Pleasure to have such optimistic and enlightening posts for new members to read...

I am all for optimism if it is well founded. If it is not, it is known as denial. This is the model forum. If there were huge upgrades this morning, people would be singing it from the roof tops. Say it how it is and you will not go far wrong.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Alvechurch 8 miles South West of Birmingham
  • Weather Preferences: Snow
  • Location: Alvechurch 8 miles South West of Birmingham

You had a good level headed teacher icy blast:D I think the models are up and down and struggling to get to grips with current synopsis, I think we are on the cusp of something really special there are some surprise snowfalls across Birmingham this morning More to follow :cold: 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: NR Worthing SE Coast
  • Location: NR Worthing SE Coast
14 hours ago, Ali1977 said:

I also note from various tweets that the METO have said its not a case of when the Atlantic breaks through, it's "if" it does...So the possibilities of of what could happen next week are open, we may see a cold potentially snowy breakdown, or a high hold the Atlantic at bay. Best case I think we need to see things follow more of the UKMOs idea and get greater heights over Greenland, if we could do that the UK may get a whole lot colder and whiter as time ticks on towards Feb..

ECM will be interesting.

GOING to be very interesting see what happens next,the bbc forecasts are very uncertain for next week,and how fast the block moves away,if it does anyway.If the front hits the cold air it could well stall and some places could see heavy snowfall as it becomes slow,moving.Some classic uk snowfalls have happened in this scenario :),after that who knows,very exciting model watching over the next few days.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Frankley, Birmingham 250masl
  • Weather Preferences: the weather extremes in general but my favourites are snow & thunderstorms
  • Location: Frankley, Birmingham 250masl
8 minutes ago, beefy201 said:

You had a good level headed teacher icy blast:D I think the models are up and down and struggling to get to grips with current synopsis, I think we are on the cusp of something really special there are some surprise snowfalls across Birmingham this morning More to follow :cold: 

Totally agree with this iv been lurking on here for years and blimey if you took notice of some of the posts on here you wouldn't no if you was coming or going tbh, just look at the models for trends not each run and think yes it's gonna get cold to then look later and think oh no its not it's now gonna be a mild etc. Very misleading at times

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...