Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Ian Docwra

Members
  • Posts

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ian Docwra

  1. The latest NetWeather radar shows a big drop in precipitation amounts - down to blues and greens everywhere from the yellows and oranges of several hours ago near the Essex and Suffolk coast. +0.2C here with moderate snow and wet ground, still, but with some settling on grass, etc. I can now see Box Hill dimly through the snow and can see that it is white up there - 300 feet makes all the difference at these temps.
  2. Agreed - people have had snow. My point was about those who were claiming that it was "nailed on" to get well below-zero temperatures everywhere and that there was nil chance of any melting - "everything coming out of the sky will be snow and will settle" was the tenor of so many here. It's one thing to have a stab at predicting what might happen, but to assume cast-iron knowledge that something WILL happen without question (and berate those who are more pragmatic) is unhelpful. Many were talking earlier in the thread about 30-40cm being quite possible, red warnings, etc., - you know the sort of hype I mean. Then there were those who refused to accept (or possibly even check) what was clearly shown to be happening to Darcy last evening by satellite imagery - it was moving away from the SE and noticeably so, yet that fact was denied by many. BTW, I'm not saying speculation is wrong; it's the vehemence with which so many simply refused to entertain any other options. If wishing made it so, eh? My point about the seeming inability of any models to predict this outcome still stands, BTW, particularly as I, as an amateur, could see it happening myself.
  3. It does call into serious question the huge build-up to this, with countless models being run and re-run, all to little avail. I am certainly no expert but a quick look at the infrared satellite late last night showed me that 'Darcy' was missing us - why couldn't anyone more knowledgeable than I see that real-time stuff?! Today, so many people are still saying that "it will come", when it clearly won't. I'm not, by the way, saying that we aren't going to have a very cold week - I think we are - but the hyperboly about record-breaking snow depths, red warnings and so on has been baffling.
  4. In that case, the Met Office data is wrong. However, many in EA seem to be reporting melting snow, which doesn't happen below freezing. Who knows?
  5. Does that mean an increase? Light to moderate snow at +0.4C here in Brockham, Surrey and sodden ground is still green.
  6. A few spots may touch freezing at times and with a strong wind it will freeze quickly. However, the Met Office reports show temperatures generally between 0C and +3C in EA.
  7. I'd suggest that the temperature isn't <0C, but around +0.5C, as confirmed by the Met Office 1200 reports of between 0C and 3C in EA generally. The longer sea track makes it warmer further north in the area (3C around The Wash). I am finding it hard to understand why so many models put the temperature well below freezing so widely today, given the well-known North Sea SST positive anomaly this winter. It might drop a little further as more air flows in from Europe, but the snow is diminishing all the time.
  8. Precisely! Exactly what I was saying yesterday - the weather has been mild to warm recently and the ground soaks that up slowly, and releases the warmth similarly slowly. I was met with a barrage of replies saying that was nonsense and that everything would instantly turn to ice, etc., etc. The air is warmer than so many seemed to expect anyway (the first pulse left Holland at -1C or -2C and travelled across an SST of up to +6C so I don't see why they thought it would stay sub-zero!) and is therefore above freezing here. As I write it is snowing a little harder here but is still +0.6C and will simply not settle on sodden ground at that temperature. Box Hill is not visible in the snowfall at the moment and I imagine it to be around -0.4C up there and so probably accumulating. Altitude is critical.
  9. The bulk of the streams of heavy showers I saw on the BBC forecast this morning at about 1000 were well to the North of the SE (across the Midlands to Wales and the Peak District, etc.), with only a few smaller ones draped across the south.
  10. Indeed, as I pointed out yesterday, it isn't below feezing very widely hence the lack of accumulation away from the heavy stuff in the far east. At 75m here in Surrey we have been at +0.6C for a while and it's wet.
  11. As I pointed out amid the derision last night before I went to bed, it only took a quick look at the Met Office infrared radar to see the steady movement away to the east of 'Darcy', but there was a barrage of people claiming it would throw out new fronts, new arms to the west, reverse, etc! We still may get a covering but the temperature is still above freezing (although that was claimed to be impossible by now by so many yesterday!), so a drop of at least 1C would be needed for that. The intensity of precipitation in the eastern fringe has generally dropped a lot in the last few hours, too. Good to know that many got the snow they so fervently hoped for.
  12. We're between Brockham and Betchworth near the Big Field. Now at +0.6C and light snow, settling on vegetation, but everything else is very wet and not accepting snow - yet. The ground is, as predicted, too warm still and the grass is wet, not white. I do wonder if all the wonderful models that people pinned so much hope on actually took proper account of the higher-than-normal SST to our east, as so many were saying that the air couldn't possibly be warm enough to be above freezing by now. It may drop below as the day progresses to allow some accumulation, but it's certainly nowhere near as clear-cut as the 'hypers' were insisting. Today should be quite interesting, at least.
  13. I got up a while ago to find a wet, snowless day. This is pretty much what I expected, despite the huge hype, but I had hoped to be wrong. I said last night that 'Darcy' was clearly moving away as shown by the infrared satellite secquences, and would only just clip the SE but I was assured that it would reverse/throw out "arms" and provide "epic" snow. Again, I hoped to be wrong. There seemed to be very little observation of the actual progress of the storm and a huge concentration on models supposedly predicting its movement (wrongly). There now looks to be dribs and drabs of precipitation around while the activity is mainly over the continent. I hope some people at least have some snow after all their wishing. For the record, here between Dorking and Reigate we have +1.2C and snow flurries. We had graupel briefly about an hour ago.
  14. Two screenshots from the Met Office infrared satellite from this evening. If anyone can tell me that Darcy's leading edge (over Germany) isn't moving E/NE and the trailing edge arced back over France also isn't moving E/SE then they can see something in the movement that I can't. Anyway, bedtime now. I look forward to being wrong...
  15. I'm just being pragmatic and saying what I'm seeing on actual satellite views, not models. If it reverses, I'll be delighted, but...
  16. Take a look at the Met Office infrared radar and play it forward from this afternoon and see the system's overall movement. This isn't a model, it's the reality of what has been happening.
  17. Yes, eastwards. Look at the Met Office infrared radar and play it forward from this afternoon. The Darcy system (the bright arc of cloud) expands slowly north but also tracks E/SE as a whole at the same time.
  18. With 'Darcy' expanding but still moving E/SE as a system, unless its expansion is faster than its movement away it will miss the UK entirely at the current rate of progress.
  19. MetOffice infrared shows the frontal plume expanding northwards but the whole system moving eastwards - away from us. Only rain at the 2100 update everywhere except high Yorkshire/Lancashire.
×
×
  • Create New...