Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Methuselah

Members
  • Posts

    67,599
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    210

Everything posted by Methuselah

  1. That's how science works, though. What would you prefer? We spend 10 years' investigating Russian steam pipes?
  2. So, what if we were just wrong to discount it - what then?
  3. And,now the 'sceptics' are doing the very same thing.
  4. Is that a narrow line of thunderstorms, down there in the southwest?
  5. Of course, Spark...Does that mean that CO2 is?
  6. A warm November? Not according to this lot: http://www.weatherbell.com/videos/encoded/1387630105_2.ogg
  7. Looking at the models as they currently stand, I think that - barring an 'Official' one flake job - the only way we can hope of seeing a proper White Christmas this year, is via a secondary depression: without something to drastically reduce mean wind-speeds, I can only see rain reaching the ground - except in the usual places...We shall see.
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2CK3mdf8Yk
  9. But, with all due respect, you are not really in a position to make that claim, are you? If there is a 'logical fallacy', the contention that consensus of data questions the reality is surely it?
  10. I don't really know; but, I suspect the fossil-fuel lobby's penchant for telling folks exactly what they want to hear (carry on as usual and bury your head in the sand) might play a considerable part?
  11. That made me laugh so much I had tears in my ears, Ian! I can only assume that Watts enjoys being a 'big fish in a minuscule pond'.
  12. Or, of a randomly distributed overlay of folks who've not got a clue? Rather like the 50-50 malarkey on Millionaire?
  13. Good question, Stodge; and one that I've been struggling with of late, too. I don't have much at all in the way of answers, but I'm erring toward the recent fluctuations in Solar output; its possible effects on the PFJ, stratospheric temperature profiles, Arctic sea-ice extent and HLBs...I could do with some expert import, I think...
  14. Can't say as I have, Ali; I refuse to pay for twaddle...
  15. No 'hyper denial drive' jonboy...AGW Theory is, like all other scientific theories, only provisionally accepted; if something comes up which leads to its eventual overthrow then, so be it. In any case, the theory will - as with all others - need to adapt to new discoveries, and so on and so forth. But I'd be prepared to put money on no-one ever being able to demonstrate that doubling atmospheric CO2 has no warming effect... Now, if Watts, Monckton et al were to put forward a coherent theory in defence of what they claim, I would sit up and listen to it; but spurious FOI fiascoes, conspiracy theories about NASA deliberately sabotaging its own satellites and the like? It all sounds like blatant obfuscation to me, I'm afraid...
  16. Try the Archive TL: http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=gfs;sess=
×
×
  • Create New...