Jump to content
Will it snow? 7 day forecast Weather Radar Will it be cold?
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Ruben Amsterdam

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    132

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Ruben Amsterdam

  1. Ruben Amsterdam
    In general today's Berlin charts do not look too bad with zonal winds clearly on the decline on 1, 10 and 30 hPa. Fluxes are strong and the strongest u-change due to EPV of the season if this verifies. In the mean while, we see temperatures increase. Allthough wave-activity is decreasing in the upper stratosphere, wave-1 remains strong at 30hPa. The 10hPa charts show a decent split and associated warmings (indicative of wave breaking?). The only true downside is the pattern at 30 hPa. The vortex remains pinned - even after it is split- over Greenland and does not show any signs of moving elsewhere.
  2. Ruben Amsterdam
    With January almost over, and February about to start, time is running out for any serious winter attemps (last March was something exceptional, we cannot assume that month will repeat itself any time soon). A reforming vortex at this point would most likely mean the end for any true winter aspirations. Allthoug a cold snap is always a possibility, of course. The next couple of days will therefore be very interesting stratospherically. Because the last couple of GFS runs seem to differ wildy in FI (or UGKB in Dutch - after the German "UltraGlasKugelBereich"), I'm inclined to say it's anybody's game at this point. The critical point (at which the runs start to deviate wildly) appears to be around the +180hrs -- +192hrs mark now. A crucial point as +192 is where the high res. ends. Tomorrow's runs (both Berlin and GFS) will be very interesting indeed Any news from the GEFS, Recretos? To end, todays 18z +192 chart shows a modest split at 10hPa (it splits earlier, actually). The million dollar question is: what will happen next? Gentleman, place your bets
  3. Ruben Amsterdam
    NAVGEM reduces the stratospheric vortex (at least temperature-wise) to zero every run in app. 120 hrs time. It's been that way for the entire season. Either the data uploaded to meteociel are corrupted, or the model just does not make sense.
  4. Ruben Amsterdam
    10.7cm solar flux has been stable the last two/three weeks around 135 and expected to rise slightly the next couple of days. I'm confident the 06z will boost moral again ​
  5. Ruben Amsterdam
    ECM and GFS reasonably agree.
  6. Ruben Amsterdam
    It's not just you.
  7. Ruben Amsterdam
    GFS12z verifies! Stuff just got interesting! Edit: ok, not as impressive as the 06z at the end, but certainly not a bad run. Edit edit: two ensembles (12z) made by Lars form our Belgain/Dutch forum weerwoord.be. 10 hpa zonal mean winds at 60N and 10hpa temps at 90N. I suspect the differences between operationals and members (early in the run) is due to resolution issues.
  8. Ruben Amsterdam
    I just love these graphs. So illustrative! It strikes me as a rather large coincidence that GFS 06z with its downgraded/different tropospheric pattern (as opposed to previous runs) shows an excellent stratospheric run. Any major differences in terms of MT events between the 06z and 00z?
  9. Ruben Amsterdam
    Decent Berlin run indeed! Also, the blue puddle of cold at 30hpa appears to warm slightly at +240 (finally!).
  10. Ruben Amsterdam
    Cold outlook? We currently have a split-like pattern in de lower stratosphere, which - in my view- is causing the Northerly high pressure areas and somewhat reduced westerlies. Or at least, allowing them to stay in place. The situation, however, is not favourable enough to support really cold patterns. One might say that the American core of the vortex is situated too far east/is too strong. The same pattern is present in the troposphere: the strong Alaskan high continously forces troughs and cold air to flow onto the Atlantic. In the mean while, EC still does not forecast the intense warming GFS has been showing. That said, GFS seem to downgrade the warming in the last couple of runs.
  11. Ruben Amsterdam
    I tend to agree with Matt, winter is well underway and yet all goodies are beyond +192. The GFS warming is inching closer, I guess, but I am still worried about EC not picking up the warming GFS has been showing for some time now. GFS vs EC. Temperature difference is huge.
  12. Ruben Amsterdam
    Pity the Alskan/Aleutian high lower down in the strat keeps fuelling the Greenland tropospheric westerlies. Hopefully the 30mb pressure profile soon matches the 1mb pattern at the end of this run (they are basicly mirror images at this point)
  13. Ruben Amsterdam
    Lower down this correlates with the main part of the vortex over Greenland and therefore westerlies. In the long run (so even beyond this chart), beating up the vortex like this probably improves our chances ofc.
  14. Ruben Amsterdam
    As long as EC is not joining GFS in the warming trend, I'd be very carefull.
  15. Ruben Amsterdam
    Yes, GFS is playing Mr. Consistency again, but EC is not on board (temperature)! Edit: again large differences between EC01-20 12z and GFS01-21 06z. Check out the difference at 1 hpa by the end of the month.
  16. Ruben Amsterdam
    "The most notable thing is the large amount zonality and cyclonic energy in the Atlantic sector, pretty much all the way from the troposphere to the upper stratosphere." I fear this is a bad thing? Thnx for your great post btw!
  17. Ruben Amsterdam
    Todays 06z confirms this development. Funny, GFS was hinting on the strong Asian warming/displacement some days ago, only to switch to a more split-like evolution. Now GFS seems to have picked up on the displacement again and is actually looking pretty at high levels. Could this be due to tropospheric developments ie. MT events? Anyone?
  18. Ruben Amsterdam
    Well, perhaps slightly off-topic here. In paleoclimate, changes in solar irradiative forcing are the main driver behind climate change on the long term (ice ages, interglacials, etc) with CO2 following warming. This is mainly due to Milankovitch cycling, not to the 11-year solar cycle. When compared to anthropogenic factors, the variation in radiative forcing caused by the 11-year cycle is relatively minor. On a global scale that is (see graph below from IPCC5). On the other hand, climate and paleoclimate is not the same as weather and we may -as the article describes- see a local effect of low solar activity in Europe. I'm not sure if the colder winters in Europe (it sparked the imagination of many painters here in the Netherlands) can actually be explained by reduced zonality in the stratosphere. I am not aware of any papers referring to this and to my knowledge this has not been included in climate models. But, as our planet continues to warm, the effect of reduced solar activity may be mitigated to some extend.
  19. Ruben Amsterdam
    Isn't it freezing cold already in Scandinavia (in Dutch we say "the stones freeze out of the ground" or "it freezes so hard, it cracks")? Even if we were sure favourable stratosphere model predictions verified, we would be unable to answer this question in this time-frame, mainly due to variability in the troposphere. Remember that the stratospheric charts shown here are all model output and by no means fixed boundary conditions/input (like solar activity, orography, or SSTs, for instance) for the models. @blizzard: we move from displacement to split and back again. Every run is a different story. Some with happy endings for us, others with a happy ending for the vortex.
  20. Ruben Amsterdam
    So, any thoughts on the recent GFS runs? Asian warming/wave-1 seems unable to force the vortex of the pole completely, me thinks. Some runs (like the 18z) pick up on wave-2 afterwards, splitting the vortex. Other runs continue the wave-1 attack while keeping the vortex mostly intact. Any thoughts on what is causing this run-to-run inconsistency?
  21. Ruben Amsterdam
    Yes, very encouraging with a nice split in the lower strat. Although wave-2 activity is deminishing overall, wave-2 is still active/present in the lower strat/trop. In fact, it may be the highest wave-2 activity lower down I have seen this winter.
  22. Ruben Amsterdam
    A very shortlived split (ish) signature at 100hPa just before this trop chart. At these levels the stratosphere is severly influenced by the troposphere and in my view it's way too early to search for splits at the >100hPa level. The tropospheric (especially in lower levels) output varies wildy from run to run after the Asian warming currently peaking at ~300hrs. Will we see the Asian warming ramp up, or do we switch to a wave-2 pattern? Too early to tell and frankly, I am waiting for the Asian warming to show up in the Berlin graphs before making any calls on the lower strat. Btw: upper strat temperatures significantly lower this morning when compared to the previous GFS runs.
  23. Ruben Amsterdam
    A reccuring feature - I think - is a strong Alaskan high (see latest EC op). To what extend does this influence the MT events we talk about? Edit: close to reversal at 1hpa? Max temp at this level is +42C!
  24. Ruben Amsterdam
    Santa isn't real - blame your parents
  25. Ruben Amsterdam
    I'm hoping for the strong Asian event to return in the evening runs. The above is nothing but yet another delay.
×
×
  • Create New...