Jump to content
Problems logging in? ×
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

UV-RAY

Members
  • Posts

    3,600
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by UV-RAY

  1. There never is as it's always into the distant future, but back on planet earth we have seen no rise in global surface temps for 17 years. Big bad CO2 is certainly proving a handful for the alarmist call to arms as it's continually refusing to play ball with their projections of mass warming anytime soon.
  2. I'd say Ian Pennell's forecast was a fantastic effort, highly informative with sound reasoning as to why he felt this winter would pan out like it has. In fact I would go as far too say it's the best and most accurate LRF I've seen, now for the tricky bit can he follow it up for Spring/Summer. Over to you Ian!
  3. Lol, well that's the coldest summer on record almost guaranteed then now,what makes me laugh is their predictive success rate of the last two years. All and sundry got that prediction right, as for a El Nino, I expect a weak nino to develop throughout the summer and my track record is as good as anyones on these matters.
  4. This is quite an interesting article on the present cycle which these guys called correctly and the next one. http://www.cdejager.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-CdeJ-HN-Sun-climate-NS-5-1112.pdf
  5. I think the very same as the evidence for such an event is mounting daily IMO, but I would say that such events will be certainly be global and not just effecting the NH, with global temps starting to decline within the next 5 years.
  6. That's a rather odd thing too say GW, of course ice will disappear cometh the summer, that's not the point of the story as you know. It's quite exceptional considering it's only been recorded once before.
  7. All the talk of the oceans acquiring masses of heat is put into perspective here. http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/26/the-relentless-increase-of-ocean-heat/
  8. Looks like a rinse and repeat of the last two months. Hats off to the Meto, MOGREPS and GLOSEA 5 have been fantastic at spotting trends this winter.
  9. Good piece by Judith Curry, you know the only climate scientist who is actually thinks for herself. http://judithcurry.com/2014/02/03/why-is-there-so-much-antarctic-sea-ice/
  10. I think you'll find that's not the case, as I'm more inclined to believe Judith Curry a climate scientist than BFTV a blogger on Net Weather.
  11. An interesting read from Judith Curry. http://judithcurry.com/2014/01/27/early-20th-century-arctic-warming/
  12. A blog site I know but still a good read. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/05/new-ceres-data-and-ocean-heat-content/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/01/ocean-heat-content-variations-satellites-vs-oceanographers/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/03/ocean-heat-content-0-to-2000-meters-why-arent-northern-hemisphere-oceans-warming-during-the-argo-era/
  13. Not at all as all previous data was using only selected data from the Indian and South Atlantic oceans, why I've no idea. Also the site in question is and remains a poor blogging site frequented by those looking to get their fix of doctored doom and gloom. Global surface temps have still not risen for 17 years, no amount of tinkering can change this.
  14. Also,would that warming be the same warming in only the Indian Ocean and South Atlantic oceans, or are they now utilising all recordings of oceanic temperatures.
  15. Is that an attempt at trying to excuse the pause, can't take it seriously as it's from a blog site and a poor one at that.
  16. You want too see my local alleged metrology presenters on BBC North west, they definitely have a mild bias, but what they know about weather you could write on the back of a postage stamp. Also the vast majority of the UK aren't interested in weather or they would be posting here.
  17. Keith, you should know now that facts are not what the manipulators deal in, remember the world sees a pause in rising temps but they see a continuing warming trend. This is why they despise Judith Curry so much , she deals in facts whilst they deal in deception.
  18. Lol, now from anyone else I would sit up and take notice.
  19. Enthused or not I for one cannot find any enthusiasm for endless gales and rain, give me anti-cyclonic gloom any day and I'll leave the "fascinating" weather for others to enjoy. On topic now and , well same old, same old, with no end in sight for any sustained cold unless the GFS has spotted a potential pattern change from now to eternity.
  20. Not at all, but we should ignore those compiling data who aren't scientist for scientific purposes, i.e. IPCC reports and empirical evidence. Also by your own standards can we accept findings by scientist arguing against climate sensitivity and the impacts of CO2?
  21. So we can make the scientist redundant then as there is clearly no need for them to be involved in the research, it's an odd thing to say BFTV and how do you define if the research is sound if you have a bias already. Maybe this explains so much why the research is pretty poor then as it's clear any Tom, Dick and Harry can get by the so called "gold standard" peer review process.
  22. There are a number of Greenpeace activist who chair various groups knocker, I posted the facts about these last year. This in itself represents a conflict of interest where no conflict should exists.
  23. Actually yes BFTV and more so if they have zero credentials in climate science. I'm surprised that you of all people would say that? Leaving aside the usual sort of engagement around here, would you not agree that it's far better that all research is conducted by scientists at least?
  24. But when you have the likes of Greenpeace and the WWF submitting reports that are included then we have a problem.
×
×
  • Create New...