Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model output discussion - Into 2021


Paul
Message added by Paul,

Please stick to discussing the model output in this thread. For more general chat , please use the winter/cold weather/snow chat, banter, moans and ramps thread

For local cold/snow and weather related chat, please head over to the Regional Area.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

Just need the T144 chart from the gfs 06z to be mirrored on every model and medium term the potential for maintaining cold remains exponentially higher than the ecm op solution:

1823030259_gfseu-0-144(2).thumb.png.bfe822ccd294a28ec9160a689282b080.png

Of course, only the first part of the puzzle, but would keep us well in the game!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL

Typically GFS gets better as others get less blocky!!

GFS still very good at T144, thats another whole week of blocked cold N/E flow, can’t grumble.

BCFF38DB-7AB4-440B-BE2B-356372E1E29E.png

Edited by Ali1977
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lincolnshire - 15m asl
  • Weather Preferences: Frost and snow. A quiet autumn day is also good.
  • Location: Lincolnshire - 15m asl

At 96h GFS is very different to both ECM and UKMO.

GFS

image.thumb.png.27e601276758262bc9810efb6e4f89b9.png

UKMO

image.thumb.png.ed99c03dcf5a7ab13817fd3d316c633b.png

ECM

image.thumb.png.ab31ccdcedcb8905b380a155ff579711.png

Note the different shape to the N Pacific low, and the different rate of development of that runner coming down along the northern coast of Norway. And crucially also GFS has heights closer to the southern tip of Greenland. Out of interest in the reliable timeframe - ie sub 96 hours - I'd suggest both JMA and GEM back GFS for mid atlantic high placement. Their 00z 84h stamps below...

image.thumb.png.182e0cb0d88eab491bedd4f4e9dc8847.png

image.thumb.png.329b3c5c432650fa7b277cb2bc81afbd.png

This show will continue to run....

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Bexleyheath (south), Kent
  • Location: Bexleyheath (south), Kent
Just now, Scott Ingham said:

Its king in america and it hinges on an american low pressure.

People have reacted to morning model runs again i believe

Not reacted, commented that the UKMO and ECM have backed away from a colder solution going forwards at day 5 on their operationals. Let's see what the later runs bring.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
Just now, mountain shadow said:

Crazy.

Not a sniff of the 6z GFS moving to the ECM/UKM.

It's either going to be very very wrong or very very right.

Watch at T-80 onwards tonight.

Watch that pacific low it needs to dive south in America.

Its literally that!

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)
  • Weather Preferences: Summer Sunshine / Winter Snow
  • Location: Hemingfield, South Yorkshire (49m / 160ft ASL)

I always did love the GFS

Just to clarify for us mere mortals re the UKMO and ECM runs from this morning and the more Westerly pattern signposted by the EPS etc

Are these models not taking account of any SSW downwelling (e.g. a QTR) or are they being caused by the SSW shuffling the pack?

I would have said the former but I am just interested?

Edited by Kentish Snowman in Yorks
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
1 minute ago, Catacol said:

At 96h GFS is very different to both ECM and UKMO.

GFS

image.thumb.png.27e601276758262bc9810efb6e4f89b9.png

UKMO

image.thumb.png.ed99c03dcf5a7ab13817fd3d316c633b.png

ECM

image.thumb.png.ab31ccdcedcb8905b380a155ff579711.png

Note the different shape to the N Pacific low, and the different rate of development of that runner coming down along the northern coast of Norway. And crucially also GFS has heights closer to the southern tip of Greenland. Out of interest in the reliable timeframe - ie sub 96 hours - I'd suggest both JMA and GEM back GFS for mid atlantic high placement. Their 00z 84h stamps below...

image.thumb.png.182e0cb0d88eab491bedd4f4e9dc8847.png

image.thumb.png.329b3c5c432650fa7b277cb2bc81afbd.png

This show will continue to run....

Yep! Not over mate at all

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
1 minute ago, Jason H said:

Not reacted, commented that the UKMO and ECM have backed away from a colder solution going forwards at day 5 on their operationals. Let's see what the later runs bring.

Yeah which is the logical thing to do you would back the majority its no critism at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Kippax (Leeds) 63m
  • Location: Kippax (Leeds) 63m

I think another thing we need is this low that comes down from iceland this weekend to be less deep and possibly track more south east of where it is here. Think it leaves too much residual energy over the region it's coming from for good heights to develop. Still might be ok though

GFSOPEU06_168_1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

The gfs at d8 not dissimilar to the pub run:

18z>673080679_gfseu-0-192(3).thumb.png.52c780bcd43182de1042b588d89403db.png06z>1110228804_gfseu-0-174(1).thumb.png.c375e76fc388605b8064d48cad7677a3.png

Edited by IDO
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: STEVENAGE, HERTS (100M ASL)
  • Location: STEVENAGE, HERTS (100M ASL)

I bloody love the GFS..it’s always been the best model in my eyes. .....At least today anyway! ❄️⛄

5FC9C84E-AAD6-445A-9B39-A9539BE95C39.png

A96D9E77-B463-4D41-A904-93B0741B4345.png

43EA0773-226B-4CF9-9F8E-4356DCBCA787.png

Edited by Tim Bland
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
  • Location: Orpington Kent.
1 minute ago, Steve Murr said:

GFS snowcover 120 as the first low tracks south

DA227EE2-5CBE-404C-8AF2-CC38DC48E7EC.thumb.png.09fc521159d8930fff01f5b53d7e21ff.png

☃️

Hehe... loving the orange splodge.... in the south east.. 06z if anything has doubled downed  up to 168 in comparison to its 00z.. not even a attempt to move towards the euros.. great model watching.

image.thumb.png.a9307c26ab19723e455310575bd9ea68.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
  • Location: Rotherham, East Dene
4 minutes ago, Kentish Snowman in Yorks said:

I always did love the GFS

Just to clarify for us mere mortals re the UKMO and ECM runs from this morning and the more Westerly pattern signposted by the EPS etc

Are these models not taking account of any SSW downwelling (e.g. a QTR) or are they being caused by the SSW shuffling the pack?

I would have said the former but I am just interested?

Its not that complicated its the extra amp in the GFS early doors pushing the pacific low deeper into america. 

It highlights the importance upstream to downstream mate

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL
  • Location: North East Cotswolds, 232m, 761feet ASL

I’d say that classes as a potential snow storm/ event!! Cold uppers 

BDDD6D28-0774-4CEE-A963-6F5FBB9636C2.png

481E88DF-7F40-43D7-ADA9-E9D4D2E554A0.png

DBB709CE-7388-4048-B181-A5B74A8C00AB.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex
  • Weather Preferences: Hurricanes, Thunderstorms and blizzards please!
  • Location: Nr Chelmsford, Essex

Well, the GFS has removed its coat and is shouting 'come on then, do you want some' at the UKMO and ECM.  Not even a trace of a backtrack here, I would say both the GFS and GFSP have upgraded in the short to medium-term!?

GFS 180

image.thumb.png.5596c9e0d2300847d9c3d616ad6c4bea.png

GFSP 120

image.thumb.png.3da9f22f805d2bca308d13dd91290424.png

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Derbyshire Peak District South Pennines Middleton & Smerrill Tops 305m (1001ft) asl.
  • Location: Derbyshire Peak District South Pennines Middleton & Smerrill Tops 305m (1001ft) asl.

GFS seems in-line with extended UKV..

19504776_viewimage-2021-01-03T082711_565.thumb.png.e503edd4c13289c9bcee5695fbb3ec39.png895408214_viewimage-2021-01-03T082720_891.thumb.png.447241467bab4f63a5e69a83ac0fe26e.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coggeshall, Nr Colchester, Essex
  • Location: Coggeshall, Nr Colchester, Essex
5 minutes ago, Steve Murr said:

GFS snowcover 120 as the first low tracks south

DA227EE2-5CBE-404C-8AF2-CC38DC48E7EC.thumb.png.09fc521159d8930fff01f5b53d7e21ff.png

☃️

Please be correct GFS

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...