Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model output discussion - The Hunt For Cold


Paul
Message added by Paul

If you're hunting for cold potential in the model output, this thread is for you. But if you'd like to look more widely at the models, please head over to the general model discussion thread.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Redhill, Surrey
  • Weather Preferences: Southerly tracking LPs, heavy snow. Also 25c and calm
  • Location: Redhill, Surrey
10 minutes ago, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:
 
   On 15/11/2018 at 17:01,  Ed Stone said: 

The 12Z evolves in a fairly unique way IMO...not only is it unlike the ECM, it's even unlike itself??

And where's the jet stream gone?

Netweather GFS Image

I wonder how long that HP would need to hang about, for nighttime temperatures to reach minus double digits?

 

Quote

 

Pete...that’s cold....but as I have been hinted before and a ‘watch’ from me..the potential LP west of Iceland looks like a ‘bomb’ to move NNW/SSE to me

  

BFTP

 Edited Thursday at 17:34 by BLAST FROM THE PAST

 

 

The above is of interest.  We try and look where we are going after the initial Easterly.  06z shows that ‘bomb’ plunging NNW/SSE around turn of the month....not for first time as I mentioned this as a ‘watch’ scenario.  Could this be where we look and have to wait that bit longer for a more stable GHP?  I’m liking this 06z....and the model wrestling....and for me the cold pattern arriving will remain a cold pattern....it’s how it manifests going forward that needs deliberating

 

BFTP

Edited by BLAST FROM THE PAST
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.

I'd rather see this than see a return to the rampant westerlies of the noughties:

Netweather GFS Image

Hopefully, a return to the variability of the 1960s, late '70s and most of the 1980s...?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Canterbury
  • Location: Canterbury

 

16 hours ago, chionomaniac said:

We need to be looking West in these scenarios. At T+168 the potential is still there

 

7 minutes ago, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:

 

The above is of interest.  We try and look where we are going after the initial Easterly.  06z shows that ‘bomb’ plunging NNW/SSE around turn of the month....not for first time as I mentioned this as a ‘watch’ scenario.  Could this be where we look and have to wait that bit longer for a more stable GHP?  I’m liking this 06z....and the model wrestling....and for me the cold pattern arriving will remain a cold pattern....it’s how it manifests going forward that needs deliberating

 

BFTP

@BLAST FROM THE PAST would you and @chionomaniac both be thinking along the same lines?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wildwood, Stafford 104m asl
  • Weather Preferences: obviously snow!
  • Location: Wildwood, Stafford 104m asl
5 minutes ago, Ed Stone said:

I'd rather see this than see a return to the rampant westerlies of the noughties:

Netweather GFS Image

Hopefully, a return to the variability of the 1960s, late '70s and most of the 1980s...?

certainly showing interesting start to Dec Ed, dreading tues/wed rain first though, very wet spell for my location coming up, the vilest setup possible for autumn

h850t850eu.pngh850t850eu.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
12 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

Looks like a 30% chance on the eps clusters of that proper cold push from the ne 

the op/control cluster is 43% 

If we have any chance of resurrecting what the gfs was gunning for up until recently, we have to see that ecm 30% go up markedly on tonight's run. Otherwise it's on to the next chase. It's not winter yet so I am not too concerned. It would be a bonus to have a very cold early blast though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Horsham, West sussex, 52m asl
  • Location: Horsham, West sussex, 52m asl
3 minutes ago, tight isobar said:

Well there you are...where ya been ??!!

Busy mate, we have to move house in January. (Landlord selling up) another reason to be confident of a cold snowy winter. - My kind of luck says I'll be moving house in a blizzard...

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
2 minutes ago, I remember Atlantic 252 said:

certainly showing interesting start to Dec Ed, dreading tues/wed rain first though, very wet spell for my location coming up, the vilest setup possible for autumn

 

Really ?

2D23F08E-6947-481C-A8CA-96077F38B771.thumb.jpeg.9ef458b248a44d2180258b1aa2d923af.jpeg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
1 minute ago, blizzard81 said:

If we have any chance of resurrecting what the gfs was gunning for up until recently, we have to see that ecm 30% go up markedly on tonight's run. Otherwise it's on to the next chase. It's not winter yet so I am not too concerned. It would be a bonus to have a very cold early blast though. 

The percentages are very similar to yesterday’s 12z run ........

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
  • Weather Preferences: blizzard conditions. ice days
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
11 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

Really ?

2D23F08E-6947-481C-A8CA-96077F38B771.thumb.jpeg.9ef458b248a44d2180258b1aa2d923af.jpeg

Yr.no

A very reliable source...imo.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy Winters, Torrential Storm Summers
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL

Eesh, not what I was hoping to see

12z

A6580606-B511-4CC1-AEA9-55F3017E90DD.thumb.gif.6013f15a1571b2bf53dbaa9887f7b9f2.gif

00z

98C60AFB-9AF9-4666-9468-2C61E5162864.thumb.gif.2173972b0b6e3bf3949f92cf3399fc95.gif

Finely balanced! Somethings got to give soon! 

Edited by karlos1983
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth
1 hour ago, Ed Stone said:

Seems like the GFS parallel is either the greatest thing since sliced bread, or it (to put it politely) still needs some work done?

To be on the safe side, I think I'll opt for the latter!

Ed I could be wrong so please correct me someone, but I think the parallel has been verifying better than any model at D9/D10 in recent times? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
3 minutes ago, Steve Murr said:

You keep looking in the wrong place - 

The models are resolving the forward speed of the pacific jet at 120 & how much angle the advection takes up towards greenland in the following 24 hours -

The UKMO / FV3 / GEM create enough vertical motion to ensure the high develops in situ over Greenland - the ECM doesnt

it has nowt to do with what you keep referring to - 

All 06 suite ( bar 06 operational is more amplified at 120 - the 06z mean / the JMA / FV3

Ive added a picture. - so assuming the more amplified angle works the blue area of PVA dropping south will start forcing your spoiler shortwave back east-

Follow it on the Fv3 & GEM

* remember ECM is the least accurate model @ day 6 currently *

949196EB-AF83-49DE-8E4C-43C985875C59.thumb.jpeg.8555032782bbeaf758826199695768df.jpeg 

Don't get me wrong Steve. I really do hope you are calling this correctly and thanks as ever for going into detail on your post. I was merely stating that all those golden gfs runs from this week showing the true winter nirvana charts did not model the south west low correctly - indeed, some didn't model it at all. The ecm did which is why none of the ecm ops showed wintry heaven. However, I am hoping you have a point but we need to see the swing back in the next 24 hours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.
  • Weather Preferences: Thunder, snow, heat, sunshine...
  • Location: Beccles, Suffolk.

You can always tell when there's a period of increased model-uncertainty at hand; peeps like to claim they have all the answers, and react almost irrationally when someone 'throws a spanner in the works', so to speak...Some of the responses to Tamara's (perfectly reasonable) suggestion, that an upcoming diminution of angular momentum, might just derail any imminent Beast From The East, were a case in point?

My point? Don't summarily disregard what folks are saying, just because it isn't what you want to hear...? 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
6 minutes ago, Man With Beard said:

Ed I could be wrong so please correct me someone, but I think the parallel has been verifying better than any model at D9/D10 in recent times? 

Possibly but this is such a delicate evolution that I doubt it makes a lot of difference

good to see the model being consistent if nothing else

going back to the eps cluster, whilst I don’t see it’s important for that 30% to grow, I do think we need the op to at least jump over to it for one run over the next 3 outputs 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield
  • Weather Preferences: Any Extreme
  • Location: Sheffield South Yorkshire 160M Powering the Sheffield Shield

Not the best of runs this morning but to be honest we were probably expecting a little too much. Although there isn't much sign of deep cold in lala land neither does it show romping mild weather so the trend is for a return to what you's expect at this time of year temperature wise. Expect plenty of chopping and changing to continue though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, blizzard81 said:

Don't get me wrong Steve. I really do hope you are calling this correctly and thanks as ever for going into detail on your post. I was merely stating that all those golden gfs runs from this week showing the true winter nirvana charts did not model the south west low correctly - indeed, some didn't model it at all. The ecm did which is why none of the ecm ops showed wintry heaven. However, I am hoping you have a point but we need to see the swing back in the next 24 hours. 

Updated FV3 06z

86D8572A-46B4-4BDE-A820-2BEC00AF1E9B.thumb.jpeg.0c6d1079702a911d2e43d9422831fec1.jpeg2A102790-7296-4C9A-B6BB-C30A7455814D.thumb.jpeg.83790feff3c762b71dd0ca7ca1df90d7.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
13 minutes ago, Mike Poole said:

Meanwhile, on the FV3 at T144, nothing has changed...

image.thumb.jpg.25d756a88663e19e93c40fb1e4487468.jpg

As I said last night. This is an intriguing battle between the ecm and the gfsp. One of these models will have much egg on face very soon, that's for sure. A great positive is as Steve M has already pointed out - the ukmo seems to be siding with the gfsp. We won't have to wait too long for this to be resolved one way or the other. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth

Clusters at D11

ec-ens_nat_z500scenarios_2018111700_264.

Compared with two days ago

ec-ens_nat_z500scenarios_2018111500_312.

Everything similar - except one crucial thing - heights over Europe have dropped on most clusters. 

It's a small difference, and far from conclusive. No one could predict that kind of micro detail at such long range. The macro signals of ridge anomaly NW and trough anomaly S and E remain consistent - only the SE element of the anomaly less clear at this stage. 

Edited by Man With Beard
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...