Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Stratosphere and Polar Vortex Watch


Paul

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: wintry
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
14 hours ago, JeffC said:

Apologies, I'm struggling to post pics from my PC...but if you follow the link it should set it all up for you!

https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/isobaric/10hPa/overlay=temp/orthographic=5.87,90.25,327/loc=109.790,44.598

What I'm seeing here is that the LP Polar Vortex has already been shoved off "Pole Position" by the HP which is warmer than the LP PV.

Then if you look where I've placed the marker, there's an area that's much warmer than the surroundings - OK -29C isn't warm but comparatively it is against -72C.

Is this wave 2 starting already or is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?

 

 

This is what I was meaning... A tad warmer this morning 

Screenshot_20181221-065627.png

Edited by JeffC
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Solihull, Midlands. (Formerly DRL)
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, thunder, hail & heavy snow
  • Location: Solihull, Midlands. (Formerly DRL)

Some absolutely devine posts in here from the likes of @Singularity , @Catacol, @Interitus and many others. Keep up the sound work guys. Can learn a lot of handy information regarding the Stratosphere and its warming and cooling events in here. 

(Edit: sorry about the ‘’ in the post after @Singularity - not sure what happened there. ) 

Edited by DiagonalRedLine
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: wintry
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
26 minutes ago, Man With Beard said:

FV3 tonight - weakest vortex ever going into January!

gfsnh-10-384.png?12

Works for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nuneaton,Warks. 128m asl
  • Weather Preferences: Snow then clear and frosty.
  • Location: Nuneaton,Warks. 128m asl
49 minutes ago, Man With Beard said:

FV3 tonight - weakest vortex ever going into January!

gfsnh-10-384.png?12

30 and 100 hPa levels from nwextra

30.thumb.png.2e548ed2e96c9f0aa0b7c2350b9db035.png100.thumb.png.46deea009ede23475702f30402264f41.png

the SV being stretched almost to splitting at mid-level with the effects being felt at the lower level by day 15 on this run.

The 100hPa pattern pretty much reflected in the gefs mean 500hPa chart which should see further ridging in the Atlantic getting further north towards Greenland as the main pv transfers towards the Siberian side.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hoyland,barnsley,south yorkshire(134m asl)
  • Weather Preferences: severe storms,snow wind and ice
  • Location: Hoyland,barnsley,south yorkshire(134m asl)

At 30hpa

yesterday v today.

pole30_nh.thumb.gif.c4f48221c3e59ee2cf363e18e77e4cd3.gif1362062468_pole30_nh1.thumb.gif.256be1ba9ce1665fc656561b0eabb29e.gif

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: wintry
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL

Now is this the warming event the models were predicting because it's getting going at a pace now, - 10C @ 10hpa... 

This is over Russia, so is this as a result of an Asian Mountain Torque event? 

Screenshot_20181222-064442.png

Edited by JeffC
Asking a question
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: wintry
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
53 minutes ago, Interitus said:

No 

OK, what is the driver then?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JeffC said:

OK, what is the driver then?  

Differential planetary wave 1 forcing causing a westward tilt of the vortex with height creating a baroclinic region with descending air resulting in adiabatic warming (closer observation of the charts will also show that the area of lowest temperatures become cooler at the same time where air is ascending).

Edited by Interitus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Brighton (currently)
  • Location: Brighton (currently)

The gfs operational doesn't look as good as yesterday with the split underwhelming and brief. The parallel is also underwhelming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Netherlands close to the coast
  • Location: Netherlands close to the coast
7 minutes ago, karyo said:

The gfs operational doesn't look as good as yesterday with the split underwhelming and brief. The parallel is also underwhelming.

EC ensemble mean was pretty confident of a split yesterday 

 

GEFS mean trending more towards a split too

 

Edited by ArHu3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.
  • Location: Longton, Stoke-on-Trent.

I’d be more worried if it was the ECM backing off and being inconsistent with the strat warming. Supposedly it models these things better than the GFS.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Brighton (currently)
  • Location: Brighton (currently)

I can't remember of another time that GFS and ECM were in so much disagreement at day 10. Tropospherically yes but not stratospherically. We need the GFS to come back on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
1 minute ago, karyo said:

I can't remember of another time that GFS and ECM were in so much disagreement at day 10. Tropospherically yes but not stratospherically. We need the GFS to come back on board.

Agreed K..

Always feel uneasy when there are conflicting signals..

Tis a shame we cant see Glosea5.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Netherlands close to the coast
  • Location: Netherlands close to the coast
6 minutes ago, karyo said:

I can't remember of another time that GFS and ECM were in so much disagreement at day 10. Tropospherically yes but not stratospherically. We need the GFS to come back on board.

It's because we can only see the operationals, not the ensemble but look at Ventrice' tweets the splits are there

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Brighton (currently)
  • Location: Brighton (currently)
2 minutes ago, ArHu3 said:

It's because we can only see the operationals, not the ensemble but look at Ventrice' tweets the splits are there

True but those tweets are from yesterday when even the gfs operationals looked better. I hope the ensembles are still interested in the split.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
1 minute ago, karyo said:

True but those tweets are from yesterday when even the gfs operationals looked better. I hope the ensembles are still interested in the split.

Every run now takes on more importance , certainly as far as GFS is concerned.. i was dissappointed with the 00Z GFS runs strat wise..

Which model will blink 1st i wonder..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
  • Weather Preferences: wintry
  • Location: Coniston, Cumbria 90m ASL
1 hour ago, Interitus said:

Differential planetary wave 1 forcing causing a westward tilt of the vortex with height creating a baroclinic region with descending air resulting in adiabatic warming (closer observation of the charts will also show that the area of lowest temperatures become cooler at the same time where air is ascending).

Thanks, so is this the start of the SSW event then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: @scotlandwx
  • Weather Preferences: Crystal Clear High Pressure & Blue Skies
  • Location: @scotlandwx

gfs-10-36.png?6

Hopefully some PSC pics incoming in the next 24-48 hrs looking at the above temp profiles.

FV3 this morning not as progressive on the split as last evening's 12z.. Always caveat the GFS 06z run, i.e. don't trust it. Wonder if the FV3 will be subject to the same 'randomness'..

gfsnh-10-240.png?6

Couple of other plots below - Temp vs Pressure, the u wind profile and also Heat Flux progression.

547251722_TempPressure22Dec.thumb.PNG.7eec034afd19bcee1c0bbca37b4a1672.PNG78813657_u22Dec.thumb.PNG.3a82c284e8f8b1abfa28a0ff3e792163.PNG12918412_vT22Dec.thumb.PNG.9311171a8eb56c779d13ba7decf49d6d.PNG

Then from the excellent link shared earlier by I, a few from the NASA site.

c61a99af-347a-308c-b3cf-35ab4a42d587.thumb.png.6abb21b7c4a53c24a7379178b8417fca.pngd3281628-c016-393a-8a7f-5f442d4102cb.thumb.png.5916a6e9a7093c6bb678e2999dec4456.png9c687b43-47cd-3c5c-a583-7e188043fbff.thumb.png.261bead5f39d2ffb5f8ad558dee290be.png

GMAO still advertising a split vortex, GFS thinking not, GFS FV3 flipping between spilt / no split, ECM retaining the split vortex. A proper model conundrum here...

Over to Zacs site to see the latest view there from around 15:00 today. Updates circa 1000 Eastern which is 1500 for us in the UK.

 

Edited by lorenzo
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...