Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion 01/09/17


phil nw.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester

This is really knife edge stuff.

One or two more GFS ensembles eject the shortwave SE (oops posted SW) and push the Atlantic low South keeping us on the cold side of the flow than have in recent runs.

P2 an example of something we want to see more of but there are a whole range of possibilities still on offer, some bring southerlies, some bring wet and windy, some dry and cool, some cold and all of it underpinned by how energy is split in the Atlantic against the block in just 3/4 days time so we really should know by end of tomorrow.

gensnh-2-1-120.png

But 13 is the lucky number as p13 has been rock solid today with this outcome

gensnh-13-1-180.png

 

Edited by Mucka
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Ramsey, Minnesota (USA)
  • Weather Preferences: Thunderstorms/Snow/Hail & Strong Winds
  • Location: Ramsey, Minnesota (USA)
5 minutes ago, jules216 said:

Hi guys, sorry for maybe off topic question, but I think it might be model related as we stand, is it true that models have lack of satellite data over Greenland?

I saw it written here before when models had no clue during blocking period,could that contribute to the fact of huge swings and forecast uncertainty even at 5 days range?

If so, is there any link to official sources that could confirm this?

 

thanks 

https://www.metcheck.com/WEATHER/discussion.asp?DiscussionID=971&DiscussionTitle=Model+Blind+Spots

Read this from Metcheck which gives a good insight to the input of data. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: DL
  • Location: DL
7 minutes ago, jules216 said:

Hi guys, sorry for maybe off topic question, but I think it might be model related as we stand, is it true that models have lack of satellite data over Greenland?

I saw it written here before when models had no clue during blocking period,could that contribute to the fact of huge swings and forecast uncertainty even at 5 days range?

If so, is there any link to official sources that could confirm this?

 

thanks 

I think Greenland's problem is it's altitude... the raw data has to be adjusted to sea level values(?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Purley, Surrey - 246 Ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: January 1987 / July 2006
  • Location: Purley, Surrey - 246 Ft ASL
1 minute ago, Luke Best said:

Boo hoo, you sound of reason you!

The mood changes in here every six hours. It's best to be realistic and expect the climatic norm with anything different to this a bonus!

The models frequently change in FI - this is not something only occurring at this time of the year. The difference is the number of eyes viewing them and every minimal change compared to summer. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Tyrone
  • Location: Tyrone
2 minutes ago, Mucka said:

This is really knife edge stuff.

One or two more GFS ensembles eject the shortwave SW and push the Atlantic low South keeping us on the cold side of the flow than have in recent runs.

P2 an example of something we want to see more of but there are a whole range of possibilities still on offer, some bring southerlies, some bring wet and windy, some dry and cool, some cold and all of it underpinned by how energy is split in the Atlantic against the block in just 3/4 days time so we really should know by end of tomorrow.

gensnh-2-1-120.png

But 13 is the lucky number as p13 has been rock solid today with this outcome

gensnh-13-1-180.png

 

There's a few P2 P13 P20 P10 hopefully the trend grows.

gensnh-20-1-192.png

gensnh-10-1-192.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: ramsgate 42m asl
  • Location: ramsgate 42m asl
28 minutes ago, snowray said:

Not quite an easterly, but this is even better, nationwide snowfall, temps of around 0c.:yahoo::cold::cold-emoji:

gfs-0-336.png

gfs-9-336.png

gfs-2-336.png

unfortunately not quite nationwide according to the precipitation chart,kent and the southwest seem to miss out on this hit (if it happens)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester
Just now, booferking said:

There's a few P2 P13 P20 P10 hopefully the trend grows.

gensnh-20-1-192.png

gensnh-10-1-192.png

Yeah let's hope so. Just noticed I wrote eject shortwave SW but obviously meant SE (corrected in my post)

At least there is more than one route to maintaining the block and drawing in cold - either energy splitting favourably or the low simply being modelled further W and S so the ridge is maintained and we stay on the cold side or something messier - I'm not fussy. :D

Be great to get at least some snow fall to low levels to complete some great early season model watching - such fickle creatures.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Darlington
  • Weather Preferences: Warm dry summers
  • Location: Darlington
15 minutes ago, northwestsnow said:

GFS12z is much better but im afraid from what i can see ukmo is poor at 144 for cold the heights across Greenland have already become detached.

-8 850's approaching Scotland

UW144-7.thumb.gif.b462c6c5cd423711c541913bbf8f32fa.gifUN144-7.thumb.gif.2d0c9ae481a16c4c3ece172d8814f67c.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
3 minutes ago, Summer Sun said:

-8 850's approaching Scotland

UW144-7.thumb.gif.b462c6c5cd423711c541913bbf8f32fa.gifUN144-7.thumb.gif.2d0c9ae481a16c4c3ece172d8814f67c.gif

Yes mate but i doubt those colder uppers will get much further south than that, ukmo/gfs are chalk and cheese at 144, just look at the heights building across Europe on ukmo.

ps I didnt even know you could access 850's on ukmo, cheers Gavin.:)

Edited by northwestsnow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Bournville Birmingham
  • Weather Preferences: Hot n cold
  • Location: Bournville Birmingham
1 hour ago, tight isobar said:

Tbf after 144..

Its a case of throwing darts in the dark..

Crossboard...

Lets see what ec-says 120/240 hrs.

On its 12z.

 

6zgfsnh-0-228.png

12zgfsnh-0-222.png

I mean! What a crazy difference.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
  • Weather Preferences: blizzard conditions. ice days
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
6 minutes ago, Sweatyman said:

I mean! What a crazy difference.

Purposely' selected next frame snapshot of 6z..before 12z. So for bringing into better time frame...

And yes' complete divergance!

Against its sister suite! ..

GFS

Edited by tight isobar
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Darlington
  • Weather Preferences: Warm dry summers
  • Location: Darlington

The 12z Op is very much on the colder side of the mean and control this afternoon beyond the end of next week up to next Thursday we have fairly good agreement

gefsens850London0.thumb.png.3472726617d4ecfa6a54d4638ba199da.png

Edited by Summer Sun
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex
  • Weather Preferences: Winter Snow, extreme weather, mainly sunny mild summers though.
  • Location: Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex
33 minutes ago, PLANET THANET said:

unfortunately not quite nationwide according to the precipitation chart,kent and the southwest seem to miss out on this hit (if it happens)

Well its never been a precise science trying to predict snow at +T336, lets say 90% of the country then, that ok?:)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hertfordshire
  • Weather Preferences: SNOW AND FREEZING TEMPS
  • Location: Hertfordshire
12 minutes ago, Summer Sun said:

The 12z mean is very much on the colder side of the mean and control this afternoon beyond the end of next week up to next Thursday we have fairly good agreement

gefsens850London0.thumb.png.3472726617d4ecfa6a54d4638ba199da.png

You mean the operational Gavin :) lol

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: ramsgate 42m asl
  • Location: ramsgate 42m asl
2 minutes ago, snowray said:

Well its never been a precise science trying to predict snow at +T336, lets say 90% of the country then, that ok?:)

sorry about that, i wasnt being picky. just that we never seem to get anything here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
  • Location: Scouthead Oldham 295mASL
Just now, Steve Murr said:

Just to add Nick auto default will be low pressure not high pressure!

Steve/nick id be interested in your thoughts on ukmo this evening- while gfs is brimming with potential at 144 im not liking the look of ukmo..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Catchgate, Durham,705ft asl
  • Location: Catchgate, Durham,705ft asl
2 minutes ago, nick sussex said:

What drama!  I don’t want to open Pandora’s box with the issue of data coverage in some key areas but this can be a factor . 

You can read that from the horses mouth and tonight’s NOAA extended discussion.

They mention upper energy in data sparse regions north of Alaska and Russia and they do sometimes allude to data problems  in previous discussions I’ve read .

The issue were seeing is the exact orientation of blocking and height seepage , that’s my new term for this winter ! Lol

As I mentioned earlier today we want the blocking boxed in and not allowed to seep towards Canada  because this then puts less forcing on energy in the Atlantic .

Effectively we want the main block to remain as far east as possible so to avoid the dreaded west neg NAO.

 

 

"height seepage"

 

I like that one.:D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy Winters, Torrential Storm Summers
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL

Blimey, 3 hour drive home and I miss all the drama. 

Big ECM coming up. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
  • Weather Preferences: blizzard conditions. ice days
  • Location: uxbridge middlesex(- also Bampton oxfordshire
8 minutes ago, nick sussex said:

What drama!  I don’t want to open Pandora’s box with the issue of data coverage in some key areas but this can be a factor . 

You can read that from the horses mouth and tonight’s NOAA extended discussion.

They mention upper energy in data sparse regions north of Alaska and Russia and they do sometimes allude to data problems  in previous discussions I’ve read .

The issue we’re seeing is the exact orientation of blocking and height seepage , that’s my new term for this winter ! Lol

As I mentioned earlier today we want the blocking boxed in and not allowed to seep towards Canada  because this then puts less forcing on energy in the Atlantic .

Effectively we want the main block to remain as far east as possible so to avoid the dreaded west neg NAO.

 

Good luck with that.(seepage)

I used the term to explain blocking releasing cold from the arctic some time ago....'cold seepage' and had my #### ripped...

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Manchester
  • Weather Preferences: Sunny and warm in the Summer, cold and snowy in the winter, simples!
  • Location: Manchester
2 minutes ago, tight isobar said:

Good luck with that.(seepage)

I used the term to explain blocking releasing cold from the arctic some time ago....'cold seepage' and had my #### ripped...

?

Hope the a** ripping didn't cause any "seepage"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth
  • Location: Drayton, Portsmouth

I think the key to a colder run is more heights to our west by T96. That gives time for the Atlantic heights to make a strong link up with heights coming from Greenland.

I don't think the ECM is as amplified as the GFS at the timeframe but a. that doesn't make it right and b. let's wait and see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: DL
  • Location: DL
30 minutes ago, Summer Sun said:

The 12z Op is very much on the colder side of the mean and control this afternoon beyond the end of next week up to next Thursday we have fairly good agreement

gefsens850London0.thumb.png.3472726617d4ecfa6a54d4638ba199da.png

Yes, a cursory glance at the GEFS suggests excitement should be reined in, at least for a little while longer.  Westerlies still seem to have the upper hand IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • European State of the Climate 2023 - Widespread flooding and severe heatwaves

    The annual ESOTC is a key evidence report about European climate and past weather. High temperatures, heatwaves, wildfires, torrential rain and flooding, data and insight from 2023, Read more here

    Jo Farrow
    Jo Farrow
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    Chilly with an increasing risk of frost

    Once Monday's band of rain fades, the next few days will be drier. However, it will feel cool, even cold, in the breeze or under gloomy skies, with an increasing risk of frost. Read the full update here

    Netweather forecasts
    Netweather forecasts
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    Dubai Floods: Another Warning Sign for Desert Regions?

    The flooding in the Middle East desert city of Dubai earlier in the week followed record-breaking rainfall. It doesn't rain very often here like other desert areas, but like the deadly floods in Libya last year showed, these rain events are likely becoming more extreme due to global warming. View the full blog here

    Nick F
    Nick F
    Latest weather updates from Netweather 2
×
×
  • Create New...