Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Arctic Sea Ice Discussion 2017 - The Melt Season


Gray-Wolf

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, convective precipitation, snow, thunderstorms, "episodic" months.
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire

The GFS operational runs and ECMWF ensemble means continue to suggest a dipole anomaly pattern setting up in about 7-9 days' time with high pressure over the Arctic Ocean, which would accelerate the (recently fairly slow) rate of melt:

ECMAVGNH12_168_1.png

That said, tonight's ECMWF operational run didn't go along with this, so it's not a certainty yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......
  • Weather Preferences: Hot & Sunny, Cold & Snowy
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......

Jaxa showing a 90,000 drop today so we might just be seeing the proper start to this years melt season. With heat now returning to the Arctic we will start to see glimpses of just how fragile our cover is this year?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, convective precipitation, snow, thunderstorms, "episodic" months.
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire

Interestingly this year's sea ice anomaly distribution is much the opposite of where it was at this time in 2012, this time we have near average sea extent on the North Atlantic side, including the Barents and Kara seas, and below average extent around the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  In 2012 the Barents/Kara area was the main area with abnormally low amounts of sea ice.

The impending dipole anomaly pattern is likely to displace more sea ice over towards the North Atlantic side and enhance the negative anomalies in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  In the short term this may not necessarily result in big net losses because it may also help slow the rate of melt in the Atlantic sector, but in the long run it may well contribute to massive losses later in the season when the sea ice bordering North Atlantic regions breaks up and melts out, leaving, well, not much beyond the immediate vicinity of the North Pole.

Edited by Thundery wintry showers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Powys Mid Wales borders.
  • Location: Powys Mid Wales borders.

The Doomsday Vault is NOT Flooded.

LET'S GET REAL- The Doomsday Vault Isn't Flooded.....

But according to one of the vault's creators, the reports are pretty overblown and everything's fine.Well, the vault's fine.

Cary Fowler, one of the creators of the vault: "Flooding is probably not quite the right word to use in this case," he told them. According to Fowler, a little bit of water has made its way into the entrance every year. Though he wasn't present at the vault when the ‘flooding' occurred this year, he insists that it's a pretty routine occurrence.

"The tunnel was never meant to be water tight at the front, because we didn't think we would need that"-

http://pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com.au/2017/05/the-doomsday-vault-is-not-flooded-agw.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Napton on the Hill Warwickshire 500ft
  • Weather Preferences: Snow and heatwave
  • Location: Napton on the Hill Warwickshire 500ft
On 2017-5-17 at 19:45, Thundery wintry showers said:

Interestingly this year's sea ice anomaly distribution is much the opposite of where it was at this time in 2012, this time we have near average sea extent on the North Atlantic side, including the Barents and Kara seas, and below average extent around the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  In 2012 the Barents/Kara area was the main area with abnormally low amounts of sea ice.

The impending dipole anomaly pattern is likely to displace more sea ice over towards the North Atlantic side and enhance the negative anomalies in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  In the short term this may not necessarily result in big net losses because it may also help slow the rate of melt in the Atlantic sector, but in the long run it may well contribute to massive losses later in the season when the sea ice bordering North Atlantic regions breaks up and melts out, leaving, well, not much beyond the immediate vicinity of the North Pole.

A different set up to 2012 but it will interesting to see what happens to the extent at the end of the month

 

VISHOP_Extent.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Morecambe
  • Location: Morecambe

Even though extent may be in the middle of the pack of recent years, it does look like a summer of quite low sea ice extent looks quite likely with lowest or 2nd lowest looking the most likely. The pacific side of the Arctic looks dire too me and we got an unprecedented polynya in the East Siberian Sea/Chuckchi so how will that affect the ice will be interesting as we head into June. If we have the heatwave early on like we saw last year in this area, the ice will surely melt out quite rapidly there just because of the large amount of open water we got there at the moment.

As it happens, there is more ice in the Kara sea now than there was during March! Has been quite a cold spring in Kara but the models are strongly hinting at the first significant warm blast hitting this area with strong southerly winds from Russia so ice pulling away from the coast looks very likely to me along with some melting also although how long will this last is open to debate. 

Some pulses of plus 0 air is now enterting the basin as we head out of May and into June, nothing too unusual in that but with such low volume and thickness, you just get the feeling its not going to take an awful lot to start rapidly melting that ice. 

Really going to be an interesting melt season coming up and the fact extent is within the pack of recent years does make it more interesting instead of lurking where 2016 is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, convective precipitation, snow, thunderstorms, "episodic" months.
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire

It's surprising that, according to NSIDC, the rate of sea ice melt hasn't sped up during the past week despite the emergence of a dipole anomaly, although the strength of the dipole and the input of warm air masses into the Arctic Ocean have both been rather weaker than previously projected by the GFS and ECMWF models.  Some relativvely warm air from central Eurasia may introduce some melting around the Barents/Kara area in the next week, where the sea ice extent is currently high for recent years, but at the same time we may see a let-up in the warm anomalies around the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  I agree, we're currently in an interesting position given the low health of the ice but rather larger extent than this time last year.

GFSOPNH12_54_2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary
  • Weather Preferences: Cold, Snow, Windstorms and Thunderstorms
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary
21 hours ago, Thundery wintry showers said:

It's surprising that, according to NSIDC, the rate of sea ice melt hasn't sped up during the past week despite the emergence of a dipole anomaly, although the strength of the dipole and the input of warm air masses into the Arctic Ocean have both been rather weaker than previously projected by the GFS and ECMWF models.  Some relativvely warm air from central Eurasia may introduce some melting around the Barents/Kara area in the next week, where the sea ice extent is currently high for recent years, but at the same time we may see a let-up in the warm anomalies around the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.  I agree, we're currently in an interesting position given the low health of the ice but rather larger extent than this time last year.

GFSOPNH12_54_2.png

Often this early in the melt season the dipole pattern tends to have a small impact on extent/area with compaction being balanced by ice spreading out elsewhere, and the input of warm air over the Arctic ocean not quite capable of dramatic melting yet. It does prime the ice for greater losses later in the season.

Latest forecasts are going for high pressure dominating in early June which is a worst case scenario type situation, especially if the pattern becomes stubborn. Having the bare ice sheet exposed to 24 hour sun while at it's strongest will likely produce widespread melt ponding. If we get a prolonged high pressure spell it is likely to manifest first as large drops in area as the sensors mistake melt ponds for open water, with the warming surface waters then contributing to much greater losses in ice coverage as the season goes on, regardless of weather conditions - like 2012.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary
  • Weather Preferences: Cold, Snow, Windstorms and Thunderstorms
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary

So, latest PIOMAS data is out and we still have the lowest volume on record for the time of year by quite a large margin.

piomas-trnd4.png?attachauth=ANoY7copRJPk

To add to that, this great animation by Wipneus shows a massive area with some of the thickest ice in the Arctic currently exiting the Fram Strait (between Svalbard and Greenland), which really doesn't bode well for the ice this summer.


There will likely be a full update on Neven's blog later today, so keep an eye out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, convective precipitation, snow, thunderstorms, "episodic" months.
  • Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire

Interesting, albeit scary, to see that the sea ice volume anomaly increased during May despite a relatively slow reduction in the sea ice extent.  NSIDC shows the melt rate accelerating somewhat over the last couple of days, fuelled by relatively warm air masses over the Barents/Kara region as well as notably warm air over the Chukchi, Beaufort and East Siberian seas.

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/

Forecasts from the GFS and ECMWF look rather concerning with high pressure remaining persistent over the region with the thickest sea ice, and also maintaining relatively warm air masses over the Barents/Kara and Chukchi/Beaufort/East Siberian seas.  Even the cold air close to the North Pole looks like being mixed out in about a week's time, so we could well see 2017 catch up with 2016 in two or three weeks' time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Skirlaugh, East Yorkshire
  • Location: Skirlaugh, East Yorkshire

The ice is starting to look pretty poor already, despite only being the first week in June. There are polynyas opening up everywhere:

https://seaice.uni-bremen.de/data/amsr2/today/Arctic_AMSR2_nic.png

These early holes accompanied with the poor synoptics could have a massive effect this season. The ice is already thinner after the mild winter, I wonder how low it could go?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)

This year is starting to feel downright malicious; having a May that favours spreading out of increasingly thin ice when it was already thin to start with, and then following up with an early-mid June dominated by 'warm blocking' and a Pacific dipole pattern is like a super-villain's master plan to destroy the Arctic atmosphere and ecosystem.

Even the smaller details leading up to the June misdemeanors are just right for maximising the level of impact;

96_mslp500_arc.png?cb=106 96_mslp850_arc.png?cb=106 

Day 4 and a ridge centred over the Pacific side joins forces with an elongated trough to send some exceptionally warm (in fact quite hot) air (850s are a reasonable guide here) through Alaska and right over to the Aleutians.Meanwhile blocking over Barents/Kara works in conjunction with a shallow low moving a little west of north toward Greenland to send a wide wedge of unusually warm air through Scandinavia. This one sees more in the way of modification from residual snow cover but not by a lot so it'll still pack a serious punch at the surface as it moves over the 'easy ice' on the Atlantic side of the Arctic. Substantial losses may occur in the space of just a week.

120_mslp500_arc.png?cb=106 120_mslp850_arc.png?cb=106

Day 5 and troughs simultaneously moving into place over N. Canada and the Siberian coastal Arctic act in combination with the blocking to form a bridge of both high pressure and exceptionally warm air. Even allowing for extensive surface modification I can see a large proportion of the CAB experiencing above-freezing temps at least intermittently.

144_mslp500_arc.png?cb=106 144_mslp850_arc.png?cb=106

Day 6 and the lows have not merged across the N. Pole which would be a good way to cut-off the warm air influx. Now I do still see this as something that could yet manifest after all, but with GFS having moved away from it after considering it on previous days, the chances of that have unfortunately become much lower over the past 24 hours.

 

Only right out at day 9 do we finally see a low moving across the CAB to interrupt the anomalously warm spell... well, mitigate it at least.

216_mslp500_arc.png?cb=106 216_mslp850_arc.png?cb=106      06_216_arctic850.png?cb=106  12_216_arctic850.png?cb=106

- but look at that fat finger of exceptional warmth through the ESS... this has been a feature of many recent GFS runs (see 06s and 12z on right), and a source of much disbelief among followers of the Arctic sea ice progression, yet now we have ECM showing something just about as dramatic!

This being as the strong blocking behind the Pacific dipole chooses eastern Asia as a vacation spot, while the seemingly eternal central-Asian/Siberian trough activity continues to throw warm air across to that region from SW/S parts of Asia.

Back when I was doing studies in Reading, I can recall seeing a reconstruction of sea ice in the 1950s in which one of the early years had a sharp dip in ice extent. I have since found that 1953 saw a similarly persistent central-Asian/Siberian trough well into the year. If my memory is accurate and this isn't just a coincidence... well, it doesn't bode well at all for the Arctic sea ice this summer :shok:

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury
  • Weather Preferences: Enjoy the weather, you can't take it with you 😎
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury

Don't often post on here, but Greenland and the Artic still have Ice! Im very suspicious of the data we get from the Artic, :nonono:

mikex.png

mike.png

mikexx.png

Edited by ANYWEATHER
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)

I have seen enough visuals to know the Arctic truly is in peril.

Greenland on the other hand has for many weeks been benefiting from the same weather patterns that have kept Barents-Kara colder than average for a long time with the sea ice holding on for longer than in many recent years in that region. It's the main reason why the sea ice extent has not been all that low relative to the volume (note 'relative'; still very low overall compared to pre-2006).

Another factor is the record winter-spring snow cover build-up over Greenland - this being thanks in large part to greater moisture availability in the warmer world. If blocking can stay away from locations NW of the UK this coming summer and early-mid autumn, Greenland may even see net gains. There is a possibility that in the near future (next decade or even few years) we could see Greenland/Arctic Canada become the primary focal point of cold through the entire N. Hem winter-spring season, though in some cases like the last one, it may have competition from central parts of the Asian continent.

On the other hand, deeper snow cover insulates the ice from the cold air, so any warm air pulses that do remove the surface snow layers will then be able to attack ice structures that are more fragile than they used to be. My personal suspicion is that Greenland will undergo a stuttering deterioration as gains via large snow deposits are more than offset by relatively short-timescale collapses of glacier feet or ice shelves. How much of a deterioration depends on to what extent a much warmer Arctic Ocean can impact it, and of course that is presuming the Arctic sea ice will in some year soon melt away soon enough to leave most of the Arctic Ocean open to significant solar input; by mid-late August is already too late in the season for that. I'd be astounded if such melt-out was achieved by that time this year... but I can't rule it out, as alarmist as that sounds :unsure2:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......
  • Weather Preferences: Hot & Sunny, Cold & Snowy
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......

I think a lot of folk get hung up on 'extent' figures? They were never intended for use inside the pack but as a way yo cope with peripheral ice and , as such, can be misleading over melt season? If any 1km square only needs 15% ( or more) cover you can see how a shattered pack, full of leads and holes, will still show up in the figures as 'solid ice' ( as it would have been in noughties??) until the ice retreat to below the 125% mark. In the cetre of the pack this year every square is doing this so there will come a point in a pack not moving a lot that all squares blink out over a few days ( even though they still have 10% ice cover).

So ,currently we are 3rd lowest on JAXA but that will suddenly drop out over July/August?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Morecambe
  • Location: Morecambe
On 06/06/2017 at 13:42, Gray-Wolf said:

I think a lot of folk get hung up on 'extent' figures? They were never intended for use inside the pack but as a way yo cope with peripheral ice and , as such, can be misleading over melt season? If any 1km square only needs 15% ( or more) cover you can see how a shattered pack, full of leads and holes, will still show up in the figures as 'solid ice' ( as it would have been in noughties??) until the ice retreat to below the 125% mark. In the cetre of the pack this year every square is doing this so there will come a point in a pack not moving a lot that all squares blink out over a few days ( even though they still have 10% ice cover).

So ,currently we are 3rd lowest on JAXA but that will suddenly drop out over July/August?

I dont think you need to look at extent figures to figure out just how serious things are getting on the pacific side of the Arctic. The polyna on the siberian side is just extraordinary and totally against any other years wirh 2011 the only other year which looks similar but no where near as bad as it is now, really think now open water could be recorded so far North in places that usually dont see any open water until very late in the season quite soon and the forecasts look pretty poor also. Any hint of a pattern change gets pushed back and if this continues then i cant see anything but a record low occuring. 

Atlantic side of the Arctic may stay steady but i much rather have more ice on the pacific than the Atlantic side. There is a chance of seeing genuine true ooen water at the pike this year i feel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)

48_mslp500_arc.png?cb=922 48_mslp850_arc.png?cb=922

120_mslp500_arc.png?cb=922 120_mslp850_arc.png?cb=922

Reviewing the model trends, the pincer movement of unusually warm air remains on course to occur across the next few days. It seems to have been drawn out a little in terms of duration. Then comes the surge of warmth from eastern Asia, and while this thankfully looks less direct than was the case a few days ago, it still introduces quite a bit of anomalously warm air and potentially above-zero surface temps to the Pacific side of the Arctic. 

240_mslp500_arc.png?cb=922 240_mslp850_arc.png?cb=922

After this we see in the 9-10 day range some hints that the Atlantic side may see a torching via blocking in the vicinity of the UK and western Scandinavia.

The GFS 18z was similar to this but the 00z this morning has instead produced blocking right across the Canadian side and so attacks the Pacific side from Alaska while keeping the Atlantic side chilly;

00_240_mslp500arc.png?cb=922 00_240_arctic850.png?cb=922

 - but this is against recent model trends and ensemble signals and may well be a result of the model seeing a massive drop in GLAAM that seems unlikely to transpire to such an extreme extent (we're not in a La Nina). Or it could just be a random fluctuation - the 06z will be telling in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary
  • Weather Preferences: Cold, Snow, Windstorms and Thunderstorms
  • Location: Ireland, probably South Tipperary
1 hour ago, John Badrick said:

New ice hasn't been forming there, so "growth" isn't really an accurate term to use.

What's happening is part of the reason why extent is currently only 3rd or 4th lowest while the volume of ice is lowest on record by a long way - the winds have been pushing the ice south into the Barents sea. Giving us essentially a very thin, spread-out pack that is hugely vulnerable to a rapid melt out this summer.

Below is the wind direction anomalies for the Arctic with the northerlies down the Barents sea quite a notable feature for early May

0uhDYG9.gif

At the same time we can see that volume is lowest on record by quite a margin despite the extra coverage moving into the Barents sea.
piomas-trnd4.png?attachauth=ANoY7cp_690G

 

So yeah, in essence that blog comes across as another climate denier attempt at misleading. I can provide a more through debunking of it when I have time at the weekend.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)

https://www.wunderground.com/cat6/arctic-sea-ice-primed-phenomenal-melt-season

Some excerpts from an excellent article on the situation at hand:

"...the ice is so depleted that even a melt season from here on that’s average by recent standards could leave the ice at a record-low extent"

"Colder-than-usual weather at high latitudes helped keep the ice extent from shrinking in May as much as it typically does." - a slight misfire here as the colder weather was mostly on the Atlantic side in conjunction with the mean winds driving ice toward Barents-Kara and so holding up extent as BFTV has just explained nicely :)

"Since the ice’s horizontal extent isn’t quite at a record low, this implies that the average thickness is exceptionally small right now"

"The fear among Arctic observers is that early-summer conditions could take advantage of that thin ice and produce a dramatically accelerated melt at some point in the next few weeks, perhaps leading to a “cliff” (a striking drop...)"

 


There is then an overview of the Beaufort High, it's recent intensification trend, and how that both encourages clear skies (24-hour solar input at this time of year) and can potentially set up the Arctic Dipole Anomaly(ADA)  pattern that draws warm air in across the Pacific side while pushing the Atlantic side sea ice out toward the ocean where it meets its end. So it's similar to the May pattern this year, but with the high pressure shifted west from Canada to Beaufort. 

The favourism for an emerging ADA pattern in recent model guidance is then highlighted. It seems we are entering a critical period over the coming fortnight in which some jaw-dropping reductions in extent may occur - but as always, nothing is a given when it comes to model projections for the Arctic more than 5 or so days ahead.

There is also mention of the likely role of oceanic heat flow through the Chukchi Sea into the Bering Strait in such extreme preconditioning. This is something I agree with as it seems a logical tie-in for the fact that the Pacific side is so well-advanced in places compared to historical years for early June.

 

There is then a summary of results from a model called CESM-MPAS which strangely enough predicts a melt-supportive ridging pattern in June-July and some troublesome storminess in August, yet keeps the minimum extent above that of 2012, at around 4 million sq. km. I wonder if it generates clouds within the ridges aided by the increased availability of moisture due to more open waters in the early summer? I have been wondering a similar thing about CFSv2, which relentlessly predicts sea ice extent somehow becoming above-average by August - though it would have to be happening to extreme levels to produce such a projection for the extent numbers.

 

To conclude, the Arctic is very vulnerable, but there is still the chance of a great escape, well at least from setting a new minimum. On the other hand, I'd not be surprised to find it looking more like the middle of most recent Augusts by as soon as early July. The spectrum of possibilities is broad to say the least!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury
  • Weather Preferences: Enjoy the weather, you can't take it with you 😎
  • Location: Evesham/ Tewkesbury

I Have asked the NISDC who funds this .....Guess What no reply , I will keep Knocking. but there is no answer:nonono:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
11 hours ago, ANYWEATHER said:

I Have asked the NISDC who funds this .....Guess What no reply , I will keep Knocking. but there is no answer:nonono:

Thanks for your efforts :good:

I have dared to become more hopeful about the Arctic's prospects after some runs showing lower mean pressure over there in the 7-10 day range - but already this has started to feature some quite intense LP systems in the ECM runs and given the thin and unusually mobile ice for the time of year, I fear there could be responses to a LP regime more like what would usually be expected late July or early August i.e. more destructive than protective.

This would be most likely with storms on the Atlantic side due to the shallow basin there. The Pacific side would have far less warm water upwelling do deal with but mechanical destruction plus movement of ice away from areas with the sea surface layer chilled by melt-water toward areas where solar input has seen little restraint could still make for bad results.

Curiously enough the state of the tropics is currently akin to what would be typical of over a month from now so it's as if the entire N. Hemisphere is that far ahead of schedule. With climate change this, of course, may simply be the new 'typical' that we must get used to. So it is that the temperature lag becomes less of a mitigating effect on the strength of the sun's rays - June could become a very challenging month in the decades to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: New Forest (Western)
  • Weather Preferences: Fascinated by extreme weather. Despise drizzle.
  • Location: New Forest (Western)

Starting to see some vigorous cyclones projected by various models during the next 10 days.

I've not got time to do a detailed post yet but I just wanted to post this insane GEM chart depicting a 950 (or even 945) hPa cyclone for next Saturday;

210_mslp500_arc.png?cb=244

Just imagine of that was to actually take place :shok:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......
  • Weather Preferences: Hot & Sunny, Cold & Snowy
  • Location: Mytholmroyd, West Yorks.......

Well ,as highlighted above, we're not looking good. If we remember how thin most of the ice was at the start of melt season it was easy to see it melt out over an 'average' melt season so that would take us well below the current record lows for extent/area/volume by September.. This June is tracking 2012 with its losses so far but with the Laptev storm expected we could see big changes over the rest of June?

Neven also highlighted the fact that we look likely to see record low global ice cover over the next few days and this time there is no Nino to blame it on?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • UK Storm and Severe Convective Forecast

    UK Severe Convective & Storm Forecast - Issued 2024-03-28 09:16:06 Valid: 28/03/2024 0800 - 29/03/2024 0600 SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WATCH - THURS 28 MARCH 2024 Click here for the full forecast

    Nick F
    Nick F
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    More rain on the way: Storm Nelson brings gales Thursday, but rain and wind easing for Easter

    Spells of rain or showers with sunshine in between affecting most areas today, snow over northern hills. Storm Nelson arrives tomorrow, bringing gales to southern coasts and windy elsewhere with further showers. Showers and wind easing somewhat into the Easter Weekend. Read the full update here

    Netweather forecasts
    Netweather forecasts
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    UK Storm and Severe Convective Forecast

    UK Severe Convective & Storm Forecast - Issued 2024-03-27 09:35:27 Valid: 27/03/2024 0900 - 28/03/2024 0600 THUNDERSTORM WATCH - WEDS 27 MARCH 2024 Click here for the full forecast

    Nick F
    Nick F
    Latest weather updates from Netweather
×
×
  • Create New...