Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model tweets


Paul

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Hoyland,barnsley,south yorkshire(134m asl)
  • Weather Preferences: severe storms,snow wind and ice
  • Location: Hoyland,barnsley,south yorkshire(134m asl)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Isle Of Lewis
  • Weather Preferences: Wild!
  • Location: Isle Of Lewis
On 15/12/2017 at 12:02, BLAST FROM THE PAST said:
Following is tweet from Michael Ventrice.
 
 
 
 
 
Talk about agreement between the end of the ECMWF EPS and GEFS for Day 15; The explosion of heights over Alaska in through the North Pole is very encouraging signature for a Wintry start to 2018.
 
Embedded
Embedded

I am confused. This was a tweet from him last Friday.  About height gains etc etc. Now 7days on he is suggesting a return of the Polar Vortex... 

I thought that we need a strong PV to get the best effect from a SSW... just like Jan 2013?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: bingley,west yorks. 100 asl
  • Location: bingley,west yorks. 100 asl
15 minutes ago, snowbunting said:

I am confused. This was a tweet from him last Friday.  About height gains etc etc. Now 7days on he is suggesting a return of the Polar Vortex... 

I thought that we need a strong PV to get the best effect from a SSW... just like Jan 2013?

Put it simply.They just watch it play out and change as much as the forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans
1 hour ago, snowbunting said:

I am confused. This was a tweet from him last Friday.  About height gains etc etc. Now 7days on he is suggesting a return of the Polar Vortex... 

I thought that we need a strong PV to get the best effect from a SSW... just like Jan 2013?

He is talking about the USA, not europe

the big news over the next fortnight will be the cold in the states 

the strat vortex returning over the pole is nothing to do with the Alaskan ridge - they are not mutually exclusive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hadleigh, Suffolk
  • Weather Preferences: An Alpine climate - snowy winters and sunny summers
  • Location: Hadleigh, Suffolk

Hopefully long rangers GloSea & ECM are onto something for blocking mid-Jan. Then it just needs to be in the right place!

https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Nuneaton,Warks. 128m asl
  • Weather Preferences: Snow then clear and frosty.
  • Location: Nuneaton,Warks. 128m asl
7 minutes ago, Blessed Weather said:

Hopefully long rangers GloSea & ECM are onto something for blocking mid-Jan. Then it just needs to be in the right place!

https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280

 

I also wonder whether their terminology for blocked includes mid-latitude as well as polar blocking so difficult to determine the type of pattern their modeling is seeing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
1 hour ago, Blessed Weather said:

Hopefully long rangers GloSea & ECM are onto something for blocking mid-Jan. Then it just needs to be in the right place!

https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280 https://twitter.com/fergieweather/status/943787865791713280

 

Alleluia! Winter's not over then! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Longden, Shropshire
  • Location: Longden, Shropshire
13 hours ago, bluearmy said:

Pretty sure that blocked is more likely to be MLB than HLB - otherwise it would have a more wintry connotation in the tweet 

That was my fear, too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
22 hours ago, phil nw. said:

I also wonder whether their terminology for blocked includes mid-latitude as well as polar blocking so difficult to determine the type of pattern their modeling is seeing.

I often think this too. To just say blocking is way too vague and to be quite honest is a bit of a cop out. It amounts to "no meat on any bones" terminology. Most laymen wouldn't even know what they meant by "blocking" anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Chisinau, Moldova.
  • Location: Chisinau, Moldova.
1 minute ago, bluearmy said:

Why would a reputable weather company tweet the details of an operational gfs run post day 8 and highlight it as being against general model guidance ??

Click bait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Chisinau, Moldova.
  • Location: Chisinau, Moldova.
Just now, bluearmy said:

should we be self regulating the stuff that ends up in here then ?  after all, anyone can tweet any old nonsense

Not sure - I have around 40 people on ignore. I like the tweets thread and don't take the one quoted seriously. Need to allow people to make their own mistakes at some point, I guess :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Hadleigh, Suffolk
  • Weather Preferences: An Alpine climate - snowy winters and sunny summers
  • Location: Hadleigh, Suffolk

Ian Fergusson tweet with insight into Euro4 and ECMWF snowfall forecasts:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...