Jump to content
Holidays
Local
Radar
Windy?
Paul

Model output discussion 25th Jan - The final third of winter beckons..

Recommended Posts

Time for a fresh thread, as the final third of winter closes in. 

Please keep posts model related in this discussion - and head over to the model banter thread for emotional reactions to the models/weather, ramps, moans and general chat..

All charts/date can be found here on Netweather:

NetWx-SR (Hi-res short range)
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=netwx-sr;sess=
 
NetWx-MR (Medium range)
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=netwx-mr;sess=
 
GFS
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=nwdc;sess=

GFS Para
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=gfspara;sess=

GFS vs GFS Para
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=gfscomp;sess=
 
Ensembles
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=ensviewer;sess=
 
ECMWF
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=ecm;sess=
 
ECMWF EPS
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=ecmens;sess=
 
Met Office Global
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=meto;sess=
 
Met Office Fax
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=charts;type=fax;sess=
 
GEM
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=gem;sess=
 
Model Comparison
http://www.netweather.tv/index.cgi?action=modelcomp;sess=

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree. With the odd wobble the UKMO has to be respected and has been very consistent this winter. Has been a strange winter to call with all the varying signals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UKMO extended looking windier and for some wetter as we move into the final month of winter

ukm2.2017020112.168.lant.troplant.prp.fcst.gentracker.png

ECM and GFS don't agree with UKMO though they keep the low further away

ecm2.2017020112.168.lant.troplant.prp.fcst.gentracker.pnggfs2.2017020112.168.lant.troplant.prp.fcst.gentracker.png

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, on the coast said:

Have to agree. With the odd wobble the UKMO has to be respected and has been very consistent this winter. Has been a strange winter to call with all the varying signals.

I would add the GEM. Bearing in mind it goes out to T240. No easterly nonsense at all, but got on board for the mini-arctic break of a couple of weeks ago. 

A good little test for it coming up, though - it's been fairly bullish about dropping the jet south a touch - northern areas could get on the right side of the polar front if its recent runs are correct:

gem-0-240.png?12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some ideas seen of a Greenland High starting into Febr

6790.png

6.png

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Tamaras and Singularitys posts . The MJO NCEP update discusses that destructive interference with the MJO should lessen in week 2  and we might see this replaced with constructive interference enhancing the MJO signal. This of course is just a forecast so best not get ones hopes up as I think we're all reaching into our model interest reserves to see out the winter. 

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear its all gone very quiet in here this evening, the lows of Monday, the highs of yesterday, and back to the lows of today - all typical of the MOD thread it seems. 

What are they showing - a theme of unsettled conditions setting in as we move through the weekend and more significantly next week,  the jet will be taking a more flatter westerly trajectory, but also signs that it will be more southerly placed than recent weeks and may still come unstuck...

There is a suggestion the alantic frontal system due to move in on Monday could be quite negatively tilted, struggling against the block.. I say reliable timeframe is Monday at best, indeed some form of channel runner is being forecasted, and a bit of a messy slack airstream to its north.

(I felt I needed to post something to keep this thread alive and wake people up..)

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm well awake 

just the models today leave nothing to add

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect its more stunned silence than anything else. GFS rolling out now is something of a horror movie. Its a Bartlett set up tbh. Of course may not happen like, but pretty grim tbh.

 

 

Edited by Jason M
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest day 5 FAX is interesting as it has a disruptive look about it and certainly builds the ridge ahead more than today's runs have

It is not taken from the ukmo run

as far as mondays front bringing anything wintry is concerned, thicknesses look much too high, even on that more interesting FAX 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think after all that came out of the GFS, ECM, GEM. and every other model and then the UKMO is right on every turn of the dice it we have it in our power to follow the one model thats why it is quite on here to night 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Jason M said:

I suspect its more stunned silence than anything else. GFS rolling out now is something of a horror movie. Its a Bartlett set up tbh. Of course may not happen like, but pretty grim tbh.

 

 

It's a poor run, but let's not kid ourselves  - it's nothing like a Bartlett set up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, bluearmy said:

Latest day 5 FAX is interesting as it has a disruptive look about it and certainly builds the ridge ahead more than today's runs have

It is not taken from the ukmo run

as far as mondays front bringing anything wintry is concerned, thicknesses look much too high, even on that more interesting FAX 

 

You'e certainly right BA and in my experience it's unusual for the fax to be modified as much as it has been.

Must admit as I found the change in the output yesterday morning baffling I equally find the change in todays output equally baffling.

I wouldn't be surprised if we see more drama yet.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Johnp said:

It's a poor run, but let's not kid ourselves  - it's nothing like a Bartlett set up.

Nope not kidding, its a Bartlett set up. Persistent band of high pressure to our SE. Its not exactly the same as the 1988 version of course and as said above it might not happen like that, but IMHO the 18z is a Bartlett set up (much like most of Dec tbh).

Your perfectly entitled to a different view but in terms of the weather we experience its splitting hairs.

Edit: Control going the same way, albeit still just enough variation in the GEFS to just leave a little doubt this evening.

 

Edited by Jason M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jason M said:

Nope not kidding, its a Bartlett set up. Persistent band of high pressure to our SE. Its not exactly the same as the 1988 version of course and as said above it might not happen like that, but IMHO the 18z is a Bartlett set up (much like most of Dec tbh).

Your perfectly entitled to a different view but in terms of the weather we experience its splitting hairs.

Well, technically, he's correct, it is not a Bartlett. It doesn't matter if it produces the same weather for us, it's still not a Bartlett.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rochey,

The term Bartlett was an internet forum invention and doesn't actually exist in meteorological text books. See below description lifted from the web...

However, in recent years (this written in autumn, 2005), these situations have been notable by their absence. What 'high' blocks there have been stay teasingly just too far east and more often than not, a broad band of high pressure extends from the Azores area, east-north-eastwards towards the Biscay / English Channel region - perhaps now & then displaced towards the Alps, as storm upon storm sweeps in from the North Atlantic, hurried along by an often powerful upper jet (see "What are jetstreams?"). Rain, gales and above average temperatures prevail, with any 'wintry' weather confined to brief incursions of Polar Maritime west or WNW'lies, or perhaps a temporary Arctic Maritime blast from the north - which is shunted away as the next surge of mild air hurries in from the west. The apparently semi-permanent belt of high pressure in the 'wrong' place has been christened ... "The Bartlett High", in honour of Paul Bartlett, a luminary of this ng, who used to put his experience of forecasting to the test by publishing a reasoned winter forecast for all to see. As Les Crossan has noted (also a stalwart of this ng), this has come to be regarded as a 'slug' - nothing moves it, not even extracting a pair of dividers and skewering the said beast as it sits dominating any particular synoptic chart!

In essence I'm just using the term to describe a particular set up a bit like the 'Murr sausage' (I still shudder at that one :rofl:). If you had said no such thing exists you would have been technically correct, however you and Johnp seem to be suggesting that a Bartlett is something else which is puzzling?

Anyway, things must be bad when this is being debated, so lets all just agree to disagree :D. Hopefully things will change and I can describe it as a 'displaced Bartlett' (always wanted to use that!).

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Rocheydub said:

Well, technically, he's correct, it is not a Bartlett. It doesn't matter if it produces the same weather for us, it's still not a Bartlett.

GFS 18z is very cyclonic a continual theme we see very cold air spilling out across the pond reinvigorating the Atlantic & the jet stream. For the British Isles pressure hits the ceiling at 1015mb through the entirety of the GFS 18z, not even near anticyclonic, jet stream largely head on or to the S of us, I suppose with some more adjustments there is a risk of northern areas being on the "right side". Quite frankly the assertion of a Bartlett is misleading. Hp to SE is fairly transient definitely not entrenched. Scottish mountains should see the return of some snow at least by opening week of February, where it's been very snow barren. 

I think some on here enjoy fabricating something different to the reality!! The models seem indecisive to me but when are they not...who knows what today will bring. :wink: 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke at work to a girl in Minnesota yesterday who had opted to work from home on account of hearing that heavy snow was due to arrive  at 3pm that afternoon.Speaking to her again today,it transpired that the snow didn't arrive until after midnight and wasn't of the intensity predicted. She said what had been predicted for her area had ended way way south.

It struck me that if the models that are no doubt prompting incorrect short-term forecasts are not getting a grip with what is happening in such a short term over ther, the knock on effect on the four and five day modelling for our neck on the woods has got no chance.

It did leave me wondering whether the poor forecast was prompted by what turned out to be a promising cold ECM run,while the butterfly wings of reality was what led to the more disappointing follow-ups.

Either way it does seem that there the generally such variability about for whatever reason that little local fluctuations upstream are  having more significant effects on subsequent mode runs than is usually the case.

The Atlantic ought to have broken through now going on what we were seeing last week.  As many have stated, potentially it won't for another week and ho knows another week after that. Then again it might!! I do take some comfort from the fact that,for all the strides in technology and our understanding of how weather patterns develop, there is much that remains as yet beyond the realms of scientific understanding.

I'm expecting a cracking UKMO 0z run when I wake up in the morning  :)   

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Jason M said:

The term Bartlett was an internet forum invention and doesn't actually exist in meteorological text books. See below description lifted from the web...

Very well aware of its origins ad it's meaning. Thanks.

3 hours ago, Timmytour said:



I'm expecting a cracking UKMO 0z run when I wake up in the morning  :)   

I'm afraid you'll be sadly disappointed!

http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/ukmo2.php

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×