Jump to content
Paul

Stratosphere temperature watch - 2016/17

Recommended Posts

I still love watching that video animation.. :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys for the excellent and very informative introduction 

To the thread,not a topic i am well up on,but the expertise of you 

Guys is second to none,and makes learning alot easier 

Keep up the excellent work,i wil be watching this thread in the

Coming months. 

C.S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting indeed Malcolm...

Let's see how back on track the discredited Cohen metaphors can go this year, sorry am not buying any of them.

Yes we have rampant 60N and south Snow advance early in season, sadly the feedback loops - bust by solar max - are poor correlations to winter predictive outlooks.

r( correlation) will sync with SAI within a parameter where Smax or Smin is not in effect - however as an informer of natural winter progression it is not a useful steer.

Pacific Variability including IO

Atl SST

Vortex Strength

Sea Ice

these are the four drivers... Guess which one I know holds the final sway given the thread ;)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through Dr Butler's tweets following @knocker's post above, and noticed this from 1 day ago. 

And AO still looking to stay negative until at least 1st Nov  http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao.shtml

So many confusing signals - I guess that's why we all find it so interesting!

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it seems development of the polar vortex has been weak so far this autumn.

Can anyone explain what an anomalous and meridional flow is and how that is linked to heat flux and its impact on thermal gradients?

GP mentioned the westerly wind being restricted to the southern hemisphere (I take it he's talking about the QBO?) - I wonder if this is linked to the SH not following its usual pattern of final warming?

Edited by Frozen Britain
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks GP, quick question to anyone who can answer really, this bit:

"That is near perfect geoeffective positioning for upward wave (Wave 1) deflection into the vortex leading to a push of the vortex towards the North Atlantic"

Wouldn't that mean a +NAO for us and a stronger jet? Or is this what we'll have to have before further blocking can take hold towards end of Nov?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read gp and rubens in depth summary of the stratosphere.  What is the most likely scenario weather wise out of this weak vortex??  Or like most on netweather need to know. Will this provide a cold and snowy outlook in the nxt few months.  Hope so 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Glacier Point said:

I know it sounds counter intuitive tcc, but there are good reasons for a weak vortex and more precisely a weak zonal wind flow during November to substantiate a tropospheric ridge in the mid Atlantic. Other drivers [ENSO state, Maritime Continent forcing] are aligned nicely to deliver this.

Thanks GP, be interesting to see what happens!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's getting hard to hide excitement with the 06z ramping things up even further. I do not recall seeing charts like this so early in the season, 2010 was more modest, wasn't it?

GFSOPNH06_384_41.png

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruben stop it now lol. Everything seems a bit odd weather wise this autumn.  Maybe were on to something totally new to the world weather.  A big change on the way maybe??  Who knows.  All I want is some cold ❄ ❄ 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Glacier Point said:

Well this is getting interesting and a possible game changer. Why chop down a tree when you can squash a seedling ?

Following the lead of the models of late last week, we have begun to tick down on a warming signal and significant weakening of zonal wind speeds in the middle and lower stratosphere. Both GEFS, GFS and EPS remain solid on developing this.

The operational GFS getting close to a reversal..

u_65N_10hpa.jpg

And right down the middle of the GEFS mean, some members dropping into reversal..

u_65N_10hpa_gefs.jpg

The EC EPS is similar and would give a sizeable clustering around +5 to +8 m/s. That is one weak vortex. Already. Even if we were to assume worst case scenario, those two GFS members going up would still translate to a sizeable negative zonal wind anomaly.

The mid tropospheric modelling continues to develop a deep upper lower dominating the North Pacific in the week 2 time frame.

gfs-ens_z500a_nhem_52.jpg

That is near perfect geoeffective positioning for upward wave (Wave 1) deflection into the vortex leading to a push of the vortex towards the North Atlantic. We are yet to see these being manifested in the strat modelling as they are a little way off, so a weak vortex looks set to become event weaker.

IMG_2901.JPGBeen waiting for effect of MT event in early October to evolve. 

 

IMG_2900.JPGIMG_2899.JPGSOI showing a neutral balance from slightly positive to negative. Delicate balancing. 

Last years Kara Sea High still resinates, an indicator of transition to Solar min. 

I believe the OPI prediction will work this year as there is no El Niño and a less energy from the Sun. 

 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saved these early this morning from the 00z gefs run

these are ens mean charts remember

gives a flavour of the environment that the strat vortex will be attempting to develop in 

 

 

IMG_4484.PNG

IMG_4485.PNG

IMG_4486.PNG

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ruben Amsterdam said:

It's getting hard to hide excitement with the 06z ramping things up even further. I do not recall seeing charts like this so early in the season, 2010 was more modest, wasn't it?

GFSOPNH06_384_41.png

Interesting chart, but it's for 5th November (T+384). How reliable are these charts at such ranges?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Paul_1978 said:

Interesting chart, but it's for 5th November (T+384). How reliable are these charts at such ranges?

I have observed them to be approximately 85% to 90% accurate in terms of the actual event but as to how much energy the wave contains that will have to be verified when ECMWF on Berlin  Uni site reaches the 25th October. 

For the professionals they have GLOSEA5,ECMWF and GFS to compare in the here and now but cannot disclose. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Paul
      A new thread, for posting and discussing tweets about the forecast models currently. Please only post tweets in this thread, not the main model or banter threads. 
      The reason for this change is that a tweets are, by their nature brief, which in turn can leave them open to multiple interpretations, which in the fast-moving model thread can mean a lot of reaction to misinterpretations which pulls the whole thing off on a tangent.
    • By Paul
      To cater for those who prefer a slower pace, more in depth discussion around the models, we've decided to setup this new thread. So if the drama and excitement of the main model thread isn't quite your thing, then please feel free to post into this thread. 
      You're also welcome to cross-post - so if you've made a longer post in the model thread, you can copy it into here, and vice-versa. 
    • By Paul
      A fresh new model thread as we start a cold spell. 
      We've made a change this morning, and that is to start a new model tweet thread. The reason for this change is that a tweets are, by their nature brief, which in turn can leave them open to multiple interpretations, which in the fast-moving model thread can mean a lot of reaction to misinterpretations which pulls the whole thing off on a tangent. So please don't post tweets into this thread - keep them to the new thread. 
      We've also started another new thread this week, and that's the In depth (chilled out) model thread, for those who want a slower paced look at the models. Cross-posting to this and the new thread is fine, the best route to doing this is to use the multiquote button (the + sign bottom left of the post), then when you go to post your new post, you'll see a button bottom right allowing you to quote the post & copy it over. 
      If you're unsure where to find the models, head over to the Netweather Charts and Data homepage, where you'll have access to all the main ones - including our in house NetWx models, the SR hires version is particularly handy when it comes to forecasting snow showers at shorter range. 
      As ever, please keep this thread to model discussion only - and that does mean actually discussing the output, not just moaning about it. If you want to moan, ramp, or even moan about ramps, please head over to the model banter thread:
       
    • By chrisbell-nottheweatherman
      Having viewed the latest longer-range Youtube video from Weatherweb (video embedded below), in which the CFS anomaly output was apparently swaying that company's thoughts regarding February's weather towards a flatter, zonal pattern), I posted the link (complete with an attempt at model-related discussion) in the relevant Model Output thread.  More than one poster remarked that, in their opinion, this model was generally inaccurate and not to be trusted.  I know that several senior posters use anomalies as a means of smoothing-out inter-run variations, so I was wondering if the CFS anomaly output is produced in a similar manner to others, and why it appears to be perceived as less useful?
       
      Thanks.
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×