Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?
IGNORED

Model Output Discussion - The Start Of Winter


Paul

Recommended Posts

Posted
  • Location: Bexleyheath (south), Kent
  • Location: Bexleyheath (south), Kent

Think we all need to take a step back to be honest. Talk of cobra meetings taking place are well wide of the mark. Looking at the gfs 06z away from scotland we are looking at nothing much apart from a few fleeting cold snaps. Yes we may well be seeing a northern hemisphere pattern change taking place. But snowfall this side of xmas is very rare for the uk apart from dec 2010 of coarse.And until the mo come on board we should all be very sceptical of the eye candy runs in fi. So lets see what the next few days bring. And if were still seeing similar output around next monday then we maybe onto something. Until then i will watch ian fergusons updates with intrest regarding the met office musings.

We all need to take a step back, or the odd excitable poster?  I don't think anybody is expecting anything too dramatic yet. Certainly agree with you about a change in the overall pattern as shown the latest model runs. What fruit that bears, we wait to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy winters, hot, sunny springs and summers.
  • Location: Runcorn, Cheshire

But knocker said gfs 6z should be binned and is there any reason why plz ?

 

I don't think we can simply 'bin' any run just because it's not showing what we want it to show. All outputs should be taken into account, otherwise the mean output would be strictly biased.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North of Glasgow 105 msl
  • Location: North of Glasgow 105 msl

I don't understand the Ens the 06 gfs showed this IMBY ?? I know I rarely post, but there seems to be lack of logic in this data?

hopefully the recent NWP verifies for as all, I just hope the devil will be in the detail

 

Temp

t2mEast~Dunbartonshire.pngt850East~Dunbartonshire.pngukmaxtemp.pngukmaxtemp.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy Winters, Torrential Storm Summers
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL

I don't think we can simply 'bin' any run just because it's not showing what we want it to show. All outputs should be taken into account, otherwise the mean output would be strictly biased.

 

I think the key here is about trends, so as you say, simply disregarding any run would be incorrect, and at the same time, some runs will show deeper cold than others so taking any one run as assurance is also not advisable, especially with the time-scales we are looking at. but as long as the overall trend continues, we should all be pretty happy with the output, the trend in my eyes from what I have seen from the models over the last 24 hours or so is definitely a trend to colder conditions the other side of Christmas, just how cold and how fruitful remains to be seen. All great viewing in any case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Solihull, Midlands. (Formerly DRL)
  • Weather Preferences: Sunshine, thunder, hail & heavy snow
  • Location: Solihull, Midlands. (Formerly DRL)

But knocker said gfs 6z should be binned and is there any reason why plz ?

I'm not 100% sure if it's true I admit but, apparently, according to Accuweather (http://m.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/why-are-the-models-so-inaccurate/18097), the GFS 06Z run (and also the 18Z run) supposedly doesn't include all the balloon data and, as such, affects the way it performs.

post-10703-0-28896400-1418824010_thumb.j

Edit: Having said that, I agree with Backtrack that no runs should necessarily be ignored, especially just incase some of these have picked out new trends that other models haven't latched on. Excluding the reliable time-frame, I imagine that there has been instances in that past where even the 06Z/18Z GFS runs have correctly modelled outcomes that other models didn't quite achieve.

Edited by DiagonalRedLine
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Llanwnnen, Lampeter, Ceredigion, 126m asl (exotic holidays in Rugby/ Coventry)
  • Location: Llanwnnen, Lampeter, Ceredigion, 126m asl (exotic holidays in Rugby/ Coventry)

Dear Santa......

 

h850t850eu.png

 

BFTP

My thats a nice one, surely the MO will publicise this cold snap/ spell soon - its looking nailed on!

Edited by TonyH
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight
  • Weather Preferences: Thunderstorms and snow
  • Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight

Some very interesting and eye candy runs of recently, GFS P have noticed keeps coming up with all different ideas, from Greenland highs, Strong Atlantic Highs and now a 2013 style looking Scandi High with Easterlies. Either way there does seem to be trend of something colder after Christmas. Still a while out, so am not getting excited about anything yet, either way its very encouraging.

 

ECM too showing good signs building north towards Greenland, nice too see good agreement on things from most of the Models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans

The current output is evolving exactly as i was expecting it to, having seen it marked on the extended ens at the end of week 2 and counted down. a few fluctuations but they are all variations on a theme.  we now have the important timescale within the high res ops (ecm and gfsp) and higher res ens modelling re the pre cold pattern and the colder pattern istelf. the eye candy charts are just that for the time being. they need to come down below T200 and then T144 before you can go and buy your snow shovel. however, the higher res ens should now give us a better idea as to how good the fi ensembles were. the early signs are encouraging.

 

would be nice for MOGREPS to climb onboard but thats not the be all and end all just yet.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Shorne West, Kent
  • Weather Preferences: Sun in summer, Snow in Winter
  • Location: Shorne West, Kent

The latest AO update seems indicative of potential pattern change.... moving into a negative value around 23rd Dec  ( 1st -4 ens showing also ) . 

The NAO swings from slightly positive to a neutral value around the same time.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

I'm not 100% sure if it's true I admit but, apparently, according to Accuweather (http://m.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/why-are-the-models-so-inaccurate/18097), the GFS 06Z run (and also the 18Z run) supposedly doesn't include all the balloon data and, as such, affects the way it performs.

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

 

Yes 06z and 18z are just for fun.

 

 

I don't understand the Ens the 06 gfs showed this IMBY ?? I know I rarely post, but there seems to be lack of logic in this data?

hopefully the recent NWP verifies for as all, I just hope the devil will be in the detail

 

Temp

 

 

The charts on the right are for the 0z run and on the left the 06z run. As I have said the ensembles don't show much of a pattern change and although the GFS P is going cold, until it gets support from the GEFS lots of uncertainty.

 

 

I don't think we can simply 'bin' any run just because it's not showing what we want it to show. All outputs should be taken into account, otherwise the mean output would be strictly biased.

 

If you look at the Oslo pressure chart for the GFS 06z P it is in outlier territory on 28th December and afterwards:

 

post-14819-0-58683100-1418824604_thumb.p  post-14819-0-72181500-1418824613_thumb.p

 

Only one other ensemble member has a Scandi high at that time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: west yorkshire
  • Weather Preferences: extreme weather
  • Location: west yorkshire

My thats a nice one, surely the MO will publicise this cold snap/ spell soon - its looking nailed on!

don't think it's nailed on yet to be honest. Yes possible but certainly far from nailed on.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Live Haddenham (Bucks). Work Heathrow Airport
  • Location: Live Haddenham (Bucks). Work Heathrow Airport

Yes 06z and 18z are just for fun.

 

 

 

The charts on the right are for the 0z run and on the left the 06z run. As I have said the ensembles don't show much of a pattern change and although the GFS P is going cold, until it gets support from the GEFS lots of uncertainty.

 

If you look at the Oslo pressure chart for the GFS 06z P it is in outlier territory on 28th December and afterwards:

 

attachicon.gifMT2_Oslo_ens.png  attachicon.gifgfs-0-264.png

 

Only one other ensemble member has a Scandi high at that time!

That's not really a proper high in Scandi anyway. It's only surface pressure. You need greens and yellows for it to start being a proper high pressure cell.

Edited by No Balls Like Snow Balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Banbury
  • Location: Banbury

My thats a nice one, surely the MO will publicise this cold snap/ spell soon - its looking nailed on!

No it isn't , charts posted are too far out to labelled nailed on, been here before with this

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: chellaston, derby
  • Weather Preferences: The Actual Weather ..... not fantasy.
  • Location: chellaston, derby

But knocker said gfs 6z should be binned and is there any reason why plz ?

 

well i read it as one of his witty remarks.. he really is quite funny and adds abit of humour to this frenetic thread.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL
  • Weather Preferences: Snowy Winters, Torrential Storm Summers
  • Location: Lytchett Matravers - 301 ft ASL

My thats a nice one, surely the MO will publicise this cold snap/ spell soon - its looking nailed on!

 

I presume this was tongue in cheek TonyH? with 9519 posts, I'm convinced you will have seen enough failed attempts to know full well it's far from nailed on! 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

That's not really a proper high in Scandi anyway. It's only surface pressure. You need greens and yellows for it to start being a proper high pressure cell.

 

Thats when it starts to build. Later in the P run: post-14819-0-23849900-1418825302_thumb.p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: North of Glasgow 105 msl
  • Location: North of Glasgow 105 msl

Yes 06z and 18z are just for fun.

 

 

 

The charts on the right are for the 0z run and on the left the 06z run. As I have said the ensembles don't show much of a pattern change and although the GFS P is going cold, until it gets support from the GEFS lots of uncertainty.

 

 

 

If you look at the Oslo pressure chart for the GFS 06z P it is in outlier territory on 28th December and afterwards:

 

attachicon.gifMT2_Oslo_ens.png  attachicon.gifgfs-0-264.png

 

Only one other ensemble member has a Scandi high at that time!

Please look again and at the 2m v 850 on the 12Z and the min v max from the op.

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Worcestershire/Warwickshire/North Oxfordshire
  • Location: Worcestershire/Warwickshire/North Oxfordshire

My thats a nice one, surely the MO will publicise this cold snap/ spell soon - its looking nailed on!

Hardly nailed on, when it's only appeared on a couple of model runs today.

 

Tomorrow it may show something different again.

 

More consistency with cross model agreement in a more reliable time frame is required.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: st albans
  • Location: st albans

That's not really a proper high in Scandi anyway. It's only surface pressure. You need greens and yellows for it to start being a proper high pressure cell.

 

i'd bite your hand off for that chart to verify

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Reigate Hill
  • Weather Preferences: Anything
  • Location: Reigate Hill

Please look again and at the 2m v 850 on the 12Z and the min v max from the op.

cheers

 

 

Yes I see what you mean, 850s below the mean and 2m above! I was thinking it was maybe the Foehn Effect but then I realised its the 06z. The op can go silly with 2m temps in FI, and looking at the London 2m it does the same there (from the 26th):

 

post-14819-0-00516800-1418826580_thumb.g

 

Ignore. One of the many reasons why the 06z is not helpful after around D6. The 12z will hopefully be more useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire
  • Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire

Yh totally agree there were some big similarities just hope that tomorrows runs don't follow the ecm. Going to be looking at 00zs runs tomoz from behind my sofa also worries me that the met office are not so enthusiastic as well now which ties in with If comments and matt hugos tweet. But can the gfs get it so spectacularly wrong at just 8 days away. Those pesky shortwaves are the bain to all coldies they never seem to help us. So hope its gone in the morning.

Yeah, I don't feel as though we have moved any further after the outputs so far today. The best news so far is the met have gone back to mentioning the possibility of colder weather in the extended. Will be watching the 12z runs with great trepidation lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Camborne
  • Location: Camborne

But knocker said gfs 6z should be binned and is there any reason why plz ?

 

It was tongue-in-cheek as a higher authority had previously decreed that when the tablet came down from the mount the 11th read, "the 06z is always rubbish and should be ignored".

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted
  • Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
  • Weather Preferences: Heat and Snow
  • Location: Batley, West Yorkshire

Things have changed a lot for Christmas day from a couple of days ago.

 

This is the chart from 3 days ago:

 

gfsnh-2014121400-0-276.png?0gfsnh-2014121400-1-276.png?0

 

This is the chart today:

 

gfsnh-0-204.png?6gfsnh-1-204.png?6

 

From +6 uppers for some to -6 uppers...

 

wasn't long ago that people were mentioning a mild Christmas day :nea:

Edited by Barry95
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • European State of the Climate 2023 - Widespread flooding and severe heatwaves

    The annual ESOTC is a key evidence report about European climate and past weather. High temperatures, heatwaves, wildfires, torrential rain and flooding, data and insight from 2023, Read more here

    Jo Farrow
    Jo Farrow
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    Chilly with an increasing risk of frost

    Once Monday's band of rain fades, the next few days will be drier. However, it will feel cool, even cold, in the breeze or under gloomy skies, with an increasing risk of frost. Read the full update here

    Netweather forecasts
    Netweather forecasts
    Latest weather updates from Netweather

    Dubai Floods: Another Warning Sign for Desert Regions?

    The flooding in the Middle East desert city of Dubai earlier in the week followed record-breaking rainfall. It doesn't rain very often here like other desert areas, but like the deadly floods in Libya last year showed, these rain events are likely becoming more extreme due to global warming. View the full blog here

    Nick F
    Nick F
    Latest weather updates from Netweather 2
×
×
  • Create New...