Daily Star

[DAVID SNOW]

of course - it is possible to go lower!

Yep, try the gaurdian

[Osbourne One-Nil]

A deliberate spelling mistake?

God bless the Grauniad.

[DAVID SNOW]

Yep, try the gaurdian

Yep,poor spelling,also poor news paper.New labour puppet paper

[londonsnow]

A deliberate spelling mistake?

God bless the Grauniad.

yep we love the grauniad. personally i'm a fan of the indie though

[DAVID SNOW]

yep we love the grauniad. personally i'm a fan of the indie though

Are you a cupid stunt by any chance?

[The PIT]

Well the first dates have gone tits up and it looks like he'll fluke this weekend at the moment.

[The PIT]

Yup fluked the weekend first time I ever remember him getting a hit.

[Solar Cycles]

Yup fluked the weekend first time I ever remember him getting a hit.

So already he has put the MetO to shame, with his LRF abilities. Actually his summer forecast, and last winters, where bang on the money too!!

[Methuselah]

So already he has put the MetO to shame, with his LRF abilities. Actually his summer forecast, and last winters, where bang on the money too!!

By forecasting highly-pinpointed winter storms that never materialized; and then 'shoe-horning' them out of/into his prognostications Post Hoc?

That's what astrologers do... B)

[Solar Cycles]

By forecasting highly-pinpointed winter storms that never materialized; and then 'shoe-horning' them out of/into his prognostications Post Hoc?

That's what astrologers do...

Aye, but it's all about trends isn't it Pete. Piers picks these trends up early, before issuing his LRF. Now comparing Piers with MetO on that basis, it's a landslide win for Piers 9/10 times. Like I keep saying, the MetO will always end up with egg on their faces, when it comes to LRF. Simply because they have an AGW bias, built into the forecasts! Where as mavericks like Piers, have no such bias to corrupt their data!

[The PIT]

So already he has put the MetO to shame, with his LRF abilities. Actually his summer forecast, and last winters, where bang on the money too!!

Err no anyone can get a fluke. Most of his forecasts are wrong but sooner or later if you say the same thing over and over you'll get a hit.

[johnholmes]

. Simply because they have an AGW bias, built into the forecasts! Where as mavericks like Piers, have no such bias to corrupt their data!

you really do sound like a broken record SC, I've given up trying to explain to you the fault in your view of AGW and UK Met.

enjoy your delusions

[Methuselah]

Aye, but it's all about trends isn't it Pete. Piers picks these trends up early, before issuing his LRF. Now comparing Piers with MetO on that basis, it's a landslide win for Piers 9/10 times. Like I keep saying, the MetO will always end up with egg on their faces, when it comes to LRF. Simply because they have an AGW bias, built into the forecasts! Where as mavericks like Piers, have no such bias to corrupt their data!

My problem with Corbyn is nothing to do with his methodology, his politics, his 'secret formulae', or his (lack of ) bias; it's just that his forecasts (IMO) are no more use than a chocolate fireguard... :lol:

[DAVID SNOW]

There are plenty of Tory papers full of paranoid lies every day.

But you still have the sun news paper... Oops, hold on, tough on crime and the causes of crime.... education education education, weapons of mass " distraction" a classic that one. The good ole sun paper has ditched wrong labour.Not to mention immigration

[DAVID SNOW]

Not to mention the sort of society you and your like will impose on us. We are an infinitely better country than 12 years ago.

Nice, would that be the post tory era, or the failed wrong labour christmas pudding?

[shuggee]

...and back on topic.