Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Red Raven

Members
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Red Raven

  1. M6.4 - TAIWAN

    Preliminary Earthquake Report

    Magnitude

    6.4

    Date-Time

    ·         6 Feb 2018 15:50:42 UTC

    ·         6 Feb 2018 23:50:42 near epicenter

    ·         6 Feb 2018 15:50:42 standard time in your timezone

    Location

    24.158N 121.680E

    Depth

    9 km

    Distances

    ·         23 km (14 miles) NNE (25 degrees) of Hua-lien, Taiwan

    ·         52 km (32 miles) SSW (199 degrees) of Su-ao, Taiwan

    ·         100 km (62 miles) SE (135 degrees) of Hsin-chu, Taiwan

    ·         1064 km (661 miles) N (4 degrees) of MANILA, Philippines

    Location Uncertainty

    Horizontal: 5.2 km; Vertical 4.1 km

    Parameters

    Nph = 83; Dmin = 8.8 km; Rmss = 0.86 seconds; Gp = 34°
    Version =

    Event ID

    us 1000chhc

  2. 31 minutes ago, gareth moo said:

    Tignes is a fantastic all round resort with a huge variety of skiing - with some amazing off piste areas if that's what your looking for. I also agree with Malcolm that Le Lac, although not pretty, is the best place to stay if you want access to the whole area including Val d'Isere. La Folie Douce is completely mental and always worth a visit especially after 3pm when it really starts bouncing. (I have also paid a visit to the equally insane Alpe d'Huez and Val Thorens branches of the chain).  However, if you're staying in Le Lac don't be late back to the Tommeuses chair as it closes at 4.45 I think. The black run back home in the twilight with a few beverages on board is generally quite 'eventful.' Tignes is an open bowl area so visibility can be compromised in poor weather although there are some lovely tree lined runs down towards La Brevieres and on the lower slopes in Val at La Daile, Fornet and Solaise. Highly recommended -  and the central private accommodation agency is super efficient via their website if you want to go independenly.

    I agree Tignes is a great location and with the new Solaise bubble out of Val makes the whole area very accessible, and if you like itineraries then Tignes is the place. I've been a few times and will be back again next week.

    • Like 1
  3. BBC site says:Currently about 11,500 hectares (28,420 acres) of the Somerset Levels are inundated by about 65 million cubic metres of water.28,000 acres is an awful lot of land to 'abandon' considering even low grade land is worth at least £1000/acre and anything half decent 2 or 3 times as much.

     

    Average farm land value for the area is £7500!

  4. Depends how high up you live. Although I see boywonder lives in Wrexham, so snow would be rare there this early! Was in the Highlands over half term, was nice to see the tops of the Cairngorms dusted white. Coming back on the train through the Lake District I didn't see any evidence of any snow on the tops there (although many of them were hidden by the large thunderstorm rolling through there that afternoon!). How are the Welsh mountains doing so far? Anyone know? When I lived in Bangor, Snowdonia could have snow on the tops by late October.

    Snow on the lakes fells today down to about 200m
    • Like 1
  5. The guy's an idiot, and so are the people that judged the competition. Edit:  No doubt someone will ask why, so here goes. 1)  It's far too large to sanely construct in the Arctic.  It's ~150 metres tall, even leaving aside the umbrella cover.  That's close to the size of the Gherkin - and you want it to float?  Some oil rigs get close to that size, but they have an open superstructure to stop themselves being capsized by the wind.  This proposal has a closed umbrella cover - there's no way you could make it stable. 2)  It's far too small to make any impact whatsoever.  The Arctic ocean is 14 million km^2, each of these structures will shade around 0.16 km^2.  The numbers needed to make a difference are astronomically high. To put it in other terms, London is around 0.1% the area of the Arctic ocean - this means that to shade 0.1% of the Arctic ocean, you need to build another London at the North Pole. 3)  It won't work even in principle, and will in fact make things worse.  Apparently the umbrella is supposed to shade the ice and absorb the "ultraviolent" energy. So, where does that energy <i>go</i> after being absorbed?  Use it to power your research base? Sure, and that means it ends up as heat.  <i>Whatever</i> you do with that energy, ultimately it will end up as heat, unless you've found a magic way around the second law of thermodynamics.  The only way to have an actual effect would be to reflect the energy, not absorb it - and do so more effectively than the bare snow and ice.  Snow has a really high albedo - pretty much any structure you put on it will only mean you absorb more energy, not less.

    Its an intellectual competition not one that is to be seriously considered!
×
×
  • Create New...