I'm 54, hence plenty old enough to remember times that most of today's climate change protagonists weren't even around for. Makes you wonder if they actually know what they're talking about, rather than what they're told. If anyone can demonstrate that the weather has changed significantly and,most importantly 'abnormally' across those decades (especially for the worse, as climate change is always about), then I'm all ears. But good luck with that. What's wrong with being a denier anyway? Does it really matter if someone isn't on the train, in the grand scheme of things? Why is it so pressing that no-one remains unconvinced? It has indeed become a witch hunt, I can see the return of the stocks and public floggings in the not too distant future for those of us who refuse to capitulate, as if we have a say or influence, or even a care as to how things pan out.