Jump to content
Snow?
Local
Radar
Cold?

Borei

Members
  • Posts

    338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Borei

  1. 6 hours ago, ALL ABOARD said:

    I don't know why I bother looking at these anymore. 

    I'd honestly be shocked if a professional meterologist is writing that. 

    There is no flow to the sentences and it's almost like they write a sentence and then add a bit after it whilst glancing back at the charts. 

     

    Drier conditions following later in the week but with a chance of further spells of rain arriving from the west.

    ☔

    So umm not drier then? 

    There's no doubt that these forecasts are poorly written and constructed from a plain English and grammar perspective. 

    At @johnholmes, it's not the meteorological content that's the issue, it's the words that are chosen to convey the message. 

    I really feel that as a supposedly premier met organisation, and with this being their main public facing content, they should take more care to ensure that the wording is appropriate. It needs to be clear, relatively easy to understand, and coherent. Too often it isn't, and frankly, whatever the quality of the underlying science, the presentation of the message is very poor and that's not good enough. 

    • Like 2
  2. Just now, Snowycat said:

    Just a thought, these aren’t automatically computer generated written forecasts are they courtesy of PC wizardry.  It might explain the poor grammar and other mistakes particularly if no “hooman” is checking them. 

    Well, possibly, but it's still not an excuse for abysmally written public facing output.

    • Like 1
  3. More evidence of a deeply un-professional malaise.

    The forecast for the period starting Tuesday 12th begins by talking about Sunday (presumably 10th).

    This is their public output, their premier forecast for every-day consumers - and it's lamentably poor. 

    An enthusiastic child would do a better job of writing them. They should be proof read and clearly they never are.

     

     

  4. Further, this boundary between the cold and milder conditions could also allow for some significant snowfall where the two air masses.

     

    I hear a lot about how the UKMO are the best in the world - an assertion which is invariably recited as an article of faith without any supporting evidence. 

    But their forecasts are often poorly written and worded, ambiguous, and in today's example above, grammatically atrocious. 

    It's un-professional and very poor. I've seen better worded fraud e mails from spoof Nigerian princes  

    • Like 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, Kasim Awan said:

    I don't understand this post. I agree it was too late, or are you trying to suggest the set up today is too weak to warrant a warning, which I don't agree with?

    Hi Kasim,

    No, my point was totally that it was too late. For hill walkers, of which there are many at weekends in this region, decisions will often be made based on MO forecasts. Getting stuck on a hill in blizzard conditions can be a really serious situation and this is where timely warnings really matter. Putting one out at 10AM for an event due at 1PM is too late.  

    As always, thanks for your really excellent interpretative contributions to this regional forum .

     

    • Like 6
  6. With its belated nowcast weather warning, I'm afraid that the MO has once more proved that it's a long way from being 'world beating'. Its forecasts are important to such as hill walkers, and this is really poor. Indeed, as Covid has exposed, our ability to deliver 'world beating' anything is more a fond illusion than a reality, and the MO is no exception. 

    Clear skies here with a low of -5.6c aided by the persisting snow cover, easily the coldest night of the winter.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 3
  7. 2 hours ago, bluearmy said:

    Unless you just arrived from Mars, that metoffice update is as wintry as you could expect them to make ........ it rarely gets better than that .....

    Quite so 

    The MO updates are always very conservative in their wording, particularly when it comes to wintry weather. 

    The interpretation of these updates is a matter for individuals. But I'm afraid that a few individuals, as we see on the MO thread, will deliberately obfuscate the prospects of a long period of below average temperatures in the heart of winter, despite it being clearly forecast from all sources (including the MO). Sceptics might say that's because they have a peculiar agenda of denial - and long periods of below average temperatures really do not fit a particular narrative. 

    I quote from the MO outlook:

    29/12 - 7/1 Temperatures are likely to remain below average through this period with wintry hazards.

    7/1 - 21/1 A continuation of rather cold conditions looks most likely into early January and towards the middle part of January. From mid-January onwards confidence is low however similar conditions are most probable with winds most likely from a northerly quadrant, bringing below average temperatures and wintry hazards at times.

     

     

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  8. 2 hours ago, bluearmy said:

    I’m not sure what WIB is thinking but he’s just wrong. It may well be more correct to say that you generally need to have had -5c uppers in place for a period prior to the snowfall arriving 

    No need to mince your words BA .

    But yesterday very clearly demonstrated  that uppers less than -5 are not a pre-requisite for UK snow. I guess in this post factual world there's a tendency to ignore evidence and simply re-iterate one's mantra of choice, particularly if it can be linked to other false narratives about an alleged hemispheric absence of cold air due to global warming .  

    But as others said in the run up to this supposed 'no snow' debacle, there are numerous parameters impacting snowfall, of which upper air temp is just one. I'm not a meteorologist, but I can read, understand and then observe post event results. You and others who explained the parameters have been proven right. The case ought to be closed. 

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  9. 39 minutes ago, northwestsnow said:

    Yes, first half of winter (bare minimum).is a complete write off for the UK mate.

    The 00z runs are among the worst i have seen in the Internet era ...(and there has been plenty of stiff competition over the years).

    I didn't hold high hopes after Glosea picked up on the +NAO but its actually far worse than i could have ever imagined.

    If anyone can offer some hope i'm all ears..

     

    December 2015 was worse!

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...