Jump to content

Recretos

Members
  • Content Count

    496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Recretos last won the day on October 14 2015

Recretos had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,114

2 Followers

About Recretos

  • Rank
    Living in the Stratosphere

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Slovenia, Central Europe 1050m ASL
  • Interests
    Weather, Playing music, Farming

Recent Profile Visitors

9,649 profile views
  1. There is not much hard data to compare the two as far as I know. There likely is data in existence, that was used during the development, testing and fine tuning phases for the new FV3. But those are probably mostly internal. At least I have not came across any comparison data. On a general note, I kinda feel an anti-FV3 agenda in this thread. Not sure why, because FV3 is a very capable solver. It is actually appropriate for the strat, as a dynamic core. Has anyone noticed when looking at the strat charts, they look much more realistic? Especially the temperature forecast. You can actuall
  2. Legacy is the GEFS v10 version. As it says on the site, it is the pre-December (v11) version. That means it is the pre-upgrade version. It has 42 vertical levels and model top at 2mb. The v11 version (december 2015-present) has 64 vertical levels and model top at 0.2mb. So the legacy version is underqualfied to be a useful strat forecasting tool. At least in the modern times.
  3. Just a side note: The GFS//GEFS suite is running without the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) data in the inputs since 15th 06z run. I have seen a warm bias in the FI before when this dataset was not in the initials. Not saying that is why we are seeing the warming. The warming is likely legit, and already seems good on the 12z as well. I am just adding a note that there is a lack of ozone data in the initials for future reference.
  4. For all that watch the zonal winds. Let me urge you to look at the geopotential heights more. At least as far as weakening/strengthening trends go. Because as the polar vortex cries for help, you might gonna see an increase in zonal winds, or at least no weakening, while the vortex is actually starting to lose the battle. It was seen on many occasions. This goes for GFS and GEFS. As the vortex goes under heavy load, via wave 1 or 2, it gets contracted, so one side of the vortex can get "compressed" which can amplify the wind speed as the pressure gradients tighten. If one looks at a 60N lat U/
  5. Of course. Trop-Strat coupling is not such an easy matter for the medium range, harder for the extended range, and very hard for the seasonal range.
  6. Well, I can share the fresh ECMWF seasonals for strat, which I just made. It does see the warming, and even escalates it towards January! For December it has the wave 2 pattern, with the warming we are seeing now in the FI GFS. January tho, it drops the bomb. Not sure it has an actual SSW, but this is definitely a weak vortex event. Not much recovery is seen in February, but that is a long lead time. UKMO Glosea5, is quite different as far as geopotential heights go. It does not have an obvious weak vortex event. These are monthly averages, but the ECM forecast i
  7. Yes, I was aware of early 3D animations, which served as a great guideline. I was not aware of this specific paper (which has great looking 3D plots), but all I ever found, was in research papers. Which is why, as I said above, I consider to be one of the first (not necessarily THE first), that did it on an operational/forecast basis, rather than research-case study examples. ?
  8. Well, any type of copyright would not be very scientific. ? Besides, the data is not mine, and also the software is not mine, so its not really possible to copyright just the method, even if I would want to. On a side note, I just noticed that after the last upgrade of the GFS to the dynamical core FV3, the model levels in the output grids got an addition of the 0.4mb level. Not a lot of forecasting power in it, but t will be interesting to see where the "lid" of the warming is. The graphic I made shows the 16-day change in temperature, a zonal mean. The warming is obvious and anomalous,
  9. Well, I did extensive research back then, and true 3D simulations of the polar vortex were nowhere to be found. There were images of a 3D polar vortex, but in a 2D (cartoonish) style, and specific to research papers individually. That was the very reason I decided to research this field (3D simulation), and essentially (by my knowledge at least) being among the first (if not the first) to create operational 3D simulations of the polar vortex in 3 (4) dimensions (time) from operational model forecast data and reanalysis data (ECMWF ERA-Interim, NASA MERRA-2). That was already in 2013 I think, s
  10. As I also stated in my article on another site, as long as the pattern configuration with the Siberian high/Aleutian low persits, there should be more of this on the way, increasing the potential for a proper SSW by the end of the year. On a seasonal note, I was in a hurry, but managed to make the 10mb temperature anomaly charts for december, from ECM and Glosea5, from October runs. Will be interesting to see the November runs. Its amazing how different they are despite pushing a similar tropospheric agenda. Tho these maps have no practical use in forecasting, it is interesting to se
  11. The circulation pattern overall is supportive for further wave activity in the stratosphere. At least if one trusts the likes of weekly CFS and JMA ensemble models. The Siberian high is a good sight to see for now, if we can also get decent lows in the North Pacific. I have gathered more thoughts in another place. An unusually strong early attack on the Polar Vortex expected! Sudden Stratospheric Warming event is not excluded in the next 30-60 days – Severe Weather Europe WWW.SEVERE-WEATHER.EU -spread the word- We often hear the term “p
  12. My new animation sequence, showing the nice wave2 pressure from GFS in late terms, which are strongly tropospheric forced, by the Alaskan and Atlantic ridges.
  13. I think it should be around 10-12th, and similar for UKMO.
  14. Great job Lorenzo! If I can make a suggestion: Reduce the amount of lon/lat lines to 90x30 interval, since for this type of data it is not as important and can sometimes even be a distraction. Also, you have an important flaw in the color scaling. You dont have zero centered colour scale, which is critical when plotting anomalies. That means that the colour scaling is centered on zero, so all negatives are on one side and positives on the other. Basically you must have 0 value in the white middle. One plot has colour bar from -80 to 60 for example, which means that the zero lands in
  15. Not really. The configurations and systematics of the CFSv2 model, are not really that appropriate for stratospheric forecasting beyond the normal operational range (15-16 days). Anything beyond that should be ensemble (breeding) only.
×
×
  • Create New...