Leaderboard

No, no and thrice no (and he would, wouldn't he). Far stronger solar flares have not occurred at the same time (more or less) as earthquakes in such a pattern as to make any link provable (e.g. was there a major earthquake around the time of the flare in March 1989 that blacked out much of eastern Canada and the north-eastern US?). The difference between the pull of gravity between the Earth and Moon next week because of the closer than normal "supermoon" (what idiot came up with that term?) is insignificant compared to the total gravitational pull. Tectonic activity on the Earth is quite sufficient to account for whatever earthquakes we have without nonsense self-publicising pseudo-science.

Found this on youtube the Earth Cracking... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6K6JcAB9T0

How about Geothermal energy. A bit harder for a country like us but Japan and all ring of fire/volcanic countries should consider that I feel.

If it's not a funny question why on Earth did they build nuclear reactors that near to the most active geological fault on the planet? Evacuation zone has already been 20 km since about lunchtime our time. "Okay, this probably sounds dumb. Could you stop the reactor by dropping a large bomb on it?" - Only if you wanted to increase the amount of radioactivity released and spread it over a much wider area. Best not.