Making negilible amounts of money ;-)
Well things have taken an interesting turn over the last few days. If you have read my first entry you will know about the whole $50 withdrawal/deposit farce, and you should also know about the $4 left over.
Now the good thing about the $4 is that I know I can't do anything about it, not until I either lose it in a tourney, or I win lots and get it up to the minimum withdrawal of $50.
So I have entered in the odd low-stakes SnG without any sort of pressure really. I wouldn't mind too much about a bad beat or finishing just outside the money, but things have been better than that.
The first few I entered, I broke even. I finished 5/9 in one, and 2/6 in the other. But a slight change in strategy put paid to the inconsistency.
You see on the play money tables with 7 players left lets say, you could get dealt a good hand like Ace-Queen on the button. So you gotta raise. Trouble is, lesser players on the play-money tables don't respect you or your potential hand, so they call, sometimes with absolute crap like 10,6 off suit. Then you're in big trouble if the flop comes 10,7,3 or biiiiiiig trouble if it's A,10,6.
I'm not saying it always does, bt generally when ou raise big with 5/6 other opponents, you still get 3/4 callers, and thats two many.
The reason why I like the lower-stakes real-money tables is that people respect eachother more. You can still get the fish who think 'sod it I'll go all in on my J,10. But usually, the table is nice and tight.
That enables me to get aggressive, and after winning lets say, one decent sized pot, you can survive to the top 3 with big raises with good hands and folding weaker ones. After that it's time to turn the aggression up a further notch!
You see when there are 9 players on a table and you have Queen-Jack, chances are someone, maybe two have better hands. But when only 3 players remain, including yourself, Queen-Jack might be the best hand, by a long way. It's therefore an excellent idea to raise. Then if everyone folds, you take down the blinds (which are quite sizeable at this stage), or someone calls (time to be wary of their hand now, so fold if you miss the flop completely), or they will re-raise you; in whcih case you must ask yourself if your hand is worth the amount of money you are about to commit. If not, then fold. It's always important to know when you are beaten.
I employed this strategy to my last 3 SnGs, two of them 9-seat, one 6-seat. My aggressive lay enabled me to do two things later in the SNG. Firstly, if I was behind, my frequent raises would often result on blind stealing, so I could eventually catch up to my opponent. Secondly if I was ahead, I could bully the smaller stacks into submission!
Part of this strategy I have learned from simple logic, but I must say that watching some other players on the high stakes SNGs (including a couple of Pro's Dipthrong and Spin31) has also improved my game hugely.
So (and I amazed myself with this) I won all three SnG's, and although the prize money is pretty low, it's still a profit. About $6 paid in, and $22 won, so not too shabby.
So that meaningless $4 in my account is currently on the rise, and is standing at $19.30c
On my next entry I will blabber on about heads-up play, which was the one part of my game I wanted to improve, and I still do!
Thanks for reading, and I hope it's not too waffly!
SnG stats:
Play Money last 5 results: 5th, 3rd, 4th, 2nd, 2nd
Real money last 5 results: 2nd, 6th, 1st, 1st, 1st
4 Comments
Recommended Comments